Welcome to Principles of Taxation. In this lesson, we will learn how it all got started. We will be looking at the birth of taxation in the United States and how we got to the point where we are now. Who makes these laws, anyway? And what is the IRS? We will also learn about other taxes besides individual federal income taxes. Finally, we'll cover how to navigate tax authority for purposes of research and how to present this information in a professional tax memo. Let’s get started.
After you have completed this lesson, you should be able to do the following:
By the end of this lesson, make sure you have completed the readings and activities found in the Lesson 1 Course Schedule.
Remember when you learned about the Boston Tea Party back in elementary school? That’s where it all started. The colonists revolted against unfair taxation without representation. When they won their independence, they wanted to make sure that there would be no more unfair taxation. So what did they do? They wrote it into the U.S. Constitution—namely, in Article I, Sections 2 and 8:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers. (U.S. Const. art. I, § 2)
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. (U.S. Const. art. I, § 8)
The taxes referred to in these two sections are concerned with property taxes and not income taxes. For the most part, the United States federal government imposed an income tax only when in need of revenue to support the military during times of war. During the Civil War, the U.S. government imposed a 3% tax on income over $600, which to us isn’t a lot—about $80,000 in terms of today’s dollar. That would be like only taxing income above $80,000 today. Could you imagine? It is a dream. These taxes were used to fund the war, and after the war, they were essentially eliminated until the late 1800s when Congress imposed a federal income tax that was not apportioned by the state population (as stated in the Constitution). Needless to say, it was challenged in the courts.
In the 1895 case of Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Company, the court ruled that a tax on rent or income from real estate is a direct tax, because “the whole beneficial interest in the land consisted in the right to take the rents and profits” (as cited in Eddlem, 2013).
The Supreme Court found this income tax to be unconstitutional, but if this is true, then why are we paying individual income taxes in the United States? What do you do to make something Constitutional? That’s right: Create an amendment to the Constitution. And so, in 1913, the 16th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified as follows:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. (U.S. Const. amend. XVI)
So there it is. Now Congress and the president have the power to create tax law. The first tax return was due on March 1, 1913.
With the constitutional ability to create income tax law, Congress immediately began. Many times people seem to think that it’s really the Internal Revenue Service behind all of the taxes and tax law, but it's not. Let’s review how a federal law is made with an oldie but a goody in Video 1.1. You may know this one.
That is how it's done. Tax law is created just like any other federal law. Figure 1.1 shows the process in a flowchart to help you grasp how tax law originates and progresses to its final passage.
The following process describes the flowchart in Figure 1.1 in a little more detail:
And that's the rest of the story. It was the acts of the Congresses and presidents over the past 100 years that have created the tax law as it stands today. The Internal Revenue Service doesn't come into it until the tax law is already ratified by Congress and the president. The Internal Revenue Service doesn't make the law, but it does organize and police it so that average taxpayers can pay their taxes and that those who don’t are identified.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the agency of the Department of the Treasury of the U.S. government that takes responsibility for administering the U.S. tax law. It was created during the Civil War to help collect the income tax imposed to fund the war. However, it rose to its current prominence with the ratification of the 16th Amendment. The IRS is charged to do two things:
The IRS creates and maintains the codification of tax law. When Congress creates a law, it isn’t organized and outlined for research purposes and easy reading. One of the roles of the IRS is organizing the law so that like subject matters are grouped together and properly coded for ease of research and citation.
You'll see the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) very soon when we look at tax research. Here is more information on the tax code itself.
In 1954, the tax law was codified to organize its specific laws for easier reference. Up to that point, laws were simply written. In order to find a statement pertaining to a certain tax issue, an attorney might have to read the entire document because there was no system in place to categorize the laws. (Some laws are thousands of pages long!) With minor changes made each year, the 1954 Code remained relatively stable until 1986.
In 1986, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA86) brought major changes to the IRC, which significantly changed the way individuals were taxed and set forth precedents that remain in effect today.
In 2001, the Bush Tax Act set forth incremental changes in the law that focused on tax savings for people who created jobs or positively impacted the U.S. economy. Because most of those people were wealthy, this act has been described as favoring the rich while penalizing the middle class.
In December 2017, the most sweeping tax reform since TRA86 became law. The new law signed by President Trump, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, significantly changed the tax law for both businesses and individuals. You will be learning this new law and its application throughout this coming semester.
As you can see, tax law changes continuously, and it is mandatory that tax professionals keep current on a daily basis—and sometimes even that isn't enough.
The IRS, for the most part, helps law-abiding citizens report their information correctly so that they act in accordance with the law. However, the IRS is also charged with making sure citizens who are not following the law are identified and penalized.
In this course, we're focusing on individual (not business) taxes, so consider the federal income tax form that you complete each spring. The IRS created that form and others to make sure individuals report their tax information according to the law. After you submit your form, the IRS is responsible for making sure you, in fact, followed the law. As a part of this process, the IRS conducts audits when clarification is necessary or when it appears a taxpayer has not followed the tax law.
Audits are a part of the required enforcement responsibility of the IRS and are something most taxpayers fear. However, most IRS audits are not scary at all. Here are the different types of audits the IRS conducts.
This is the most common type of audit. It occurs when the IRS finds a small discrepancy on a taxpayer’s tax return. The IRS notifies the taxpayer by letter to request information to resolve the issue. The taxpayer then responds by mail either to provide the information or to make further clarification. It's through this correspondence that the IRS and taxpayer resolve the issue, with the taxpayer possibly receiving a refund, paying additional tax, or having no change made to the tax amount.
This is an audit conducted at the taxpayer's IRS regional office. This type of audit is usually conducted when more information is needed than the IRS can resolve by mail. A face-to-face meeting is then conducted at the IRS regional office to resolve the issues.
This happens when the IRS needs to look at significant items on the tax return and requires the audit to be conducted at the taxpayer’s residence or place of business. When an office or field audit is completed, the internal revenue agent prepares a report of the audit's findings. If the taxpayer doesn't agree with these findings, then they have a legal remedy by disputing them in tax court. There are different tax courts where a taxpayer can file a lawsuit, as well as different levels of appellate courts. Some cases may even make it to the Supreme Court.
Figure 1.2 shows the courts used for federal income tax disputes. Note that there is a court of small claims where taxpayers who have small issues to resolve can plead their cases. Decisions that have been made through the small claims court may not be appealed to a higher court, however.
Remember that the IRS is like the police of the tax law, which means it isn't the final word. The federal tax system works the same way traffic law does: Whether you disagree with a speeding citation or an IRS audit, you can go to court to have it resolved.
So, now that you know how tax law is created by the federal government and administered by the IRS, what other types of taxes are there?What other taxes are there besides the federal income tax? Let’s take a look. They tend to fall into a few basic categories—specifically
Let’s take a look at each one and see how they work.
Certain state and local income taxes are administered by the state and local governments and can be computed in different ways. Some follow the same system as the federal income tax and some have their own system. There are even states that have no income tax at all: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, Wyoming, New Hampshire, and Tennessee. Local taxes work in the same way. State income taxes fund the state government, while local income taxes fund the local governments.
An ad valorem tax is placed on the value of an asset a person owns. There are traditionally two types of ad valorem taxes: personal property and real estate.
Personal property tax is placed on the value of an asset that is not real estate, such as automobiles, stock, bonds, boats, and so on. The tax is usually computed by multiplying the fair market value of the property by a set percentage. Some states that don’t have an income tax (e.g., Florida) may have a personal property tax instead. Other states have an income tax as well as a personal property tax.
Real estate tax is placed on the value of real estate property. It's usually assessed by the state and local governments and, like personal property tax, it's calculated by taking a set percentage and multiplying it by the fair or assessed value of the property. Ad valorem taxes usually fund state and local governments.
There is no federal sales tax (yet!). Instead, sales tax is imposed by state and local governments as another way to collect revenue. Different states tax different items at different rates, and it is usually assessed when the item is purchased by the ultimate consumer. For example, Pennsylvania currently taxes most nonnecessity goods at a rate of 6% applied at the cash register. Five states don’t have a sales tax—Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Alaska—but Alaska's local municipalities may impose one. People who live in sales tax states may try to avoid paying sales tax by purchasing items (especially large-ticket items) in non-sales-tax states to save money.
What is so wrong about that? Well, if the consumer brings it back to their resident state to use, and if there would have been sales tax on that item if purchased in the resident state, then the consumer is expected to pay that state a sales tax on the item—called a use tax. If they don’t, they may be subject to fines and penalties, and possibly an audit, too. This is becoming very prevalent with online sales transactions. Taxpayers usually pay use tax on items when filing their state tax returns or by filling out a special form, depending on the location.
Learn more about Internet sales tax in the article Internet Sales Tax: A 50-State Guide to State Laws, by Diana Fitzpatrick.
You may remember payroll tax from your prior Introduction to Accounting course. If you have a job, your employer is required to withhold taxes from your wages. But employers are also required to pay taxes based on your wages! Why? Because the taxing authority says so!
Employers assume the burden of these taxes and calculate them as part of your annual compensation package. So what are these payroll taxes?
The Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) is comprised of two taxes: Social Security and Medicare. The federal government states that each employee must contribute to these benefit plans and that the employer must also contribute on behalf of the employee. The taxes are applied to the employee's annual wages, and the Social Security portion of the tax has a maximum limitation.
For Social Security,
For Medicare,
A self-employed taxpayer must pay both the employer and the employee parts of FICA taxes.
The State Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) is imposed by the state in which the employee resides and is used to fund the state unemployment system. Usually, only employers are required to pay this tax based on a certain amount of the earnings of each employee.
The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is paid by the employer to help fund state unemployment benefits. This tax is computed on the first $7,000 of each employee's gross wages at 0.6% each year.
Excise taxes are imposed by the federal, state, and local governments, and the most well-known is on gasoline. The gas tax in particular is usually imposed by both federal and state governments, and different states, of course, have different rates. Like sales tax, this tax is usually added to the price per gallon seen at the gas pump.
Other types of excise taxes are applied to alcohol and tobacco products, gambling revenues, and even your cell phone bill. If you're starting to see a pattern here, it's no coincidence. Most people call this the “sin tax” because it's placed on items that the government may not want consumers to use, at least not in excess. Therefore, these items get taxed additionally to raise the cost and, possibly, discourage purchases. Although excise taxes are usually built into the price of the item at purchase, some are added afterward (e.g., hotel excise taxes).
The federal government only taxes estates, not inheritances. But what's an estate? According to the IRS, an individual's "gross estate includes all property in which the decedent [individual] had an interest (including real property outside the United States)" at death (Internal Revenue Service, 2017). The estate tax comes into play when the person dies, at which time federal taxes must be paid on whatever assets the person owned at death. If you're reading carefully, right about now you're probably thinking, "Wait, a person even pays tax at death?" And the answer is yes—sort of. Estate taxes can be a complex area.
In general, people who have estates in excess of $5.6 million at death would have to pay a federal estate tax. In addition, their state of residence might require payment, too. Some states have estate taxes due at death just like the federal government; however, other states only assess an inheritance tax.
If, according to Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary (n.d.), an inheritance is "money, property, etc., that is received from someone when that person dies," then an inheritance tax is the amount the government expects from the person receiving inherited property. The inheritor is responsible for paying the required inheritance tax, which is usually imposed at a rate based on the inheritor's relationship to the deceased. The closer in relationship, the lower the tax rate, so that in most states, property passed from one spouse to the other escapes tax entirely.
Learn more about which states impose different taxes in the article State Tax Chart: Which States Collect Income Taxes, Sales Taxes, Death Taxes and/or Gift Taxes?, by Julie Garber.
Let's go back to that question from earlier: Does a person have to pay taxes at death? Sort of—depending on the tax. Remember it this way:
One last tax we need to look at is gift inter vivos, or gift tax. It's one that people sometimes wonder about and don’t really understand. It's unusual because it taxes not the recipient of the gift but the donor, and because not all gifts are taxed. Because it's usually a federal tax, we'll focus on the federal version here, but be aware that some states are starting to impose gift taxes, as well. It's covered in more detail on the next page because it's a little more complicated than the others! So let's move on to understand more.
These are some of the common types of taxes assessed at the federal, state, and local level, which are all used to fund the various government levels.
The IRS defines a gift inter vivos in the definition of gift tax.
The gift . . . is . . . the transfer of property by one individual to another while receiving nothing, or less than full value, in return. . . . You make a gift if you give property (including money), or the use of or income from property, without expecting to receive something of at least equal value in return. If you sell something at less than its full value or if you make an interest-free or reduced-interest loan, you may be making a gift (Internal Revenue Service, 2016).
By this definition, gifts inter vivos include
In contrast, some items are not considered gifts and therefore are not taxable. Most of the items listed above are self-explanatory but must be followed carefully—for instance, in the following ways:
Tuition or medical expenses: Tuition and medical expenses must be paid directly to the institution. The amount cannot be paid to an individual to pay the expenditure him- or herself.
Gifts to your spouse: Gifts to a spouse must be given to a spouse that is recognized under federal tax law, which includes same-sex marriages. There are several rules concerning alien (non-U.S. citizen) spouses.
Gifts to a political organization for its use: Gifts to political organizations must be made directly to the organization, not to a specific candidate.
Gifts to charities: Gifts to charities may seem simple, but the charity must be recognized by the IRS as a qualified charity adhering to the rules of not-for-profit organizations.
Annual gifting exclusion: The annual exclusion is an annual amount that each taxpayer is allowed to give per recipient before incurring a gift tax and is the most important rule to remember.
This law allows each taxpayer to gift a certain amount each year to as many recipients as the taxpayer wants. In English, that means that with the current annual exclusion set at $15,000, you can give each person in the world $15,000 each year without incurring any gift tax. However, if you give any one person $16,000, then you will have to report a taxable amount of $1,000 because you've exceeded the limitation. It doesn't matter if you give one person $13,000 and another person $16,000—you cannot average the amount between the recipients. You still have to pay tax on that $1,000 difference.
Ultimately, a gift follows these three primary rules:
At Thanksgiving dinner, Mason announced that he and his husband Kendall are buying a house. Mason's mom and dad, Sharla and Carl, want to give them $20,000 to help with the purchase. Will they be taxed on the $6,000 that exceeds the $15,000 annual exclusion? Actually, that depends on the details. Sharla and Carl have several ways to structure the $20,000 gift so that it isn't considered a tax event:
Despite the confines of gift tax law, there are still legal ways to work for the best interest of the family without incurring additional taxes.
The value of gifts that a taxpayer gives to each person is tracked during the year. If the total of the gifts to an individual in a year exceeds the annual exclusion amount, the IRS will tax the excess at the gift tax rate. At least that's usually the case, but taxpayers may be able to reduce or eliminate gift taxes each year completely through the unified credit: a joint credit for gift and estate taxes.
To understand the unified credit, think back to the estate tax. As you may remember, only estates valued over $5.6 million are subject to estate tax. Why $5.6 million? Because that's the deduction allowed for computing estate taxes. The unified credit allows taxpayers to reduce the value of any gifts they grant while alive by preemptively applying this $5.6 million estate tax deduction to the gifts as credit. In this way, they can eliminate taxable gifts during their lifetime and consequently also gift taxes. In addition, taxpayers can opt to use the $5.6 million unified credit to pay any gift taxes that exceed the annual exclusion each year. Because gift tax rates are 40% at their highest level, most taxpayers opt to use a portion of the $5.6 million deduction now in order to reduce gift taxes on taxable gifts over their lifetime.
So, what happens to taxpayers who use up all $5.6 million of this deduction in gift tax credits during their lifetime? At death, their deduction would be $0.00, and their estate would be taxed without the deduction. Eventually, the taxpayer always pays tax on transferred items, be they gifts during their lifetime or an estate at death.
Read on for an example of this very interesting integrated taxing system (gifts and estates).
Let's look at a comprehensive example illustrating how the unified credit works with taxable gifts.
Arthur is a wealthy man who would like to reduce his estate before he dies. He is aware of the rules regarding estate taxes and gift taxes and wants to make certain he transfers as much of his wealth to his family as possible while paying minimal tax. He is married, and the current fair market value (FMV) of his assets is $12,000,000. Where do we start?
Well, we know that, thanks to the estate tax deduction, the total he can get rid of tax-free is $5.6 million through regular transfers.
Some simple subtraction tells us that $12,000,000 - $5,600,000 = $6,400,000. So what do we do with the rest? The following might be good options.
Since Arthur is married, his spouse might own half of his property depending on how it's titled. But what if she doesn't? Arthur should consider transferring assets into his spouse's name. (Unless there's some reason he doesn't want to: Pending separation? Much younger spouse? Gold-digger issues? Too naïve and trusting?)
Besides putting his spouse's name on property titles, Arthur can also transfer money to his spouse. But how much? Remember that she's also allowed to transfer $5.6 million tax-free when she dies, so it would make sense to transfer up to that amount to her as long as Arthur trusts her. This means that of his $12 million estate, he can transfer $5.6 million of the remaining $6.4 million to his wife with no gift or estate tax implications.
Time for some more subtraction: $6,400,000 - $5,600,000 = $800,000. We've come a long way, but that's still quite a bit for Arthur to pay taxes on. Unless there's some other way to avoid them.
Let's look at Arthur's family members and their pending events.
Thanks to the annual exclusion, Arthur can gift $15,000 to each of his family members each year tax-free—and so can Arthur's wife, for a total of $30,000 to each family member per year, none of which would be taxable.
In addition, Arthur can make payments to cover medical expenses and educational expenses for his family, and as long as he pays the institution directly, those gifts wouldn't be taxable either. So Arthur should consider paying for his children's education and medical bills and the education and medical bills of his grandchildren or other family members. He could even pay for nonfamily members, too.
Let's assume that Arthur is maximizing his gifts and finds that he will still have a taxable estate. What do we do in this case?
As Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have realized, they would prefer to give their hard-earned income to organizations that reflect their personal beliefs rather than give it to the IRS. Arthur should consider a clause in his will that provides for charitable gifts to be made with the remainder of his wealth, thus eliminating taxation on his estate. In this way, Arthur has been able to maximize his family wealth and minimize taxation.
Remember that when Arthur passes away, the executor of the estate will assess the value of his assets and subtract any unified deduction that remains after deducting the taxable portion of gifts he gave throughout his life. It's that final amount upon which estate taxes would be imposed. These rates can reach 40% on an estate.
While wealth transfer is not part of this course, it's an important topic for all accountants to study because everyone has an estate, and each estate's structure can impact the individual income tax of its beneficiary. Also, clients will come to you for advice on whether to gift now or wait to pass along their assets at death.
Now that we have covered the different types of taxes, it's time to look at the research process and the end result: a memo to file and a letter to the client.Now that you have an idea of the different types of taxes, it's time to look at how to find specific tax law to support the way that you, the tax preparer, handle a tax question or situation. Remember from prior discussion that there are many different areas where you can look for answers and guidance for handling taxes or deductions on a tax return.
Therefore, it's imperative for you to understand the process for locating the resources necessary to properly analyze each scenario you'll encounter throughout this course. Please review the three parts to the tax research process, which is what should go into conducting a successful search of tax sources:
The following primary code sources will be important as you research:
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is located in Title 26 of the U.S. Code. The format of the Code is rather important to understand. Income Taxes is under Subtitle A.
The code is broken down as follows:
To navigate the slide viewer below, click on the successive gray dots or arrows to move to a new slide.
Reported decisions state the determination and carry legal weight. The IRS can choose to accept these decisions (acquiesce) or not.
Memorandum decisions state the determination but don't carry legal weight. These decisions aren't published. The IRS can acquiesce or not.
Summary decisions apply to only one case and therefore carry very little weight. The IRS will not acquiesce because it is the opinion of only one judge. These decisions can be appealed to the District Court of Appeals.
The tax research process involves working through the following steps:
Let's look at the tax research process in more detail in Video 1.2.
This first lesson provided information on the birth and creation of the tax system currently used for federal income tax purposes in the United States. It discussed how tax law is actually created in the United States as well as the role of the IRS in tax administration. Remember, income tax isn't the only kind of tax. You learned about other taxes that exist in the United States, with a special focus on gift taxes. Finally, there was a detailed presentation on the tax research process, including how to use tax libraries and conduct tax research from start to finish. With this information as the starting point of this course, Lesson 2 will look at the tax structure and tax formula that is used as a basis for individual income tax calculations.
Eddlem, T. R. (2013). Before the income tax. Retrieved from https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/14268-before-the-income-tax
Inheritance. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inheritance
Internal Revenue Service. (2016). Gift tax. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/gift-tax
Internal Revenue Service. (2017). Instructions for Form 706. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i706
U.S. Const. amend. XVI.
U.S. Const. art. I, §§ 2–8.
Van Buren, A. (2015, July 13). Couple deep in tax hole need help in climbing out. Retrieved from http://www.uexpress.com/dearabby/2015/7/13/couple-deep-in-tax-hole-need