PSYCH100:

Unit 2: Nature and Nurture

Overview (1 of 3)
Overview

Overview

This unit will explore the topic of nature versus nurture.

Unit Readings and Activities

By the end of this lesson, make sure you have completed the readings and activities found in the course schedule.

Unit 2 Lecture Presentation (2 of 3)
Unit 2 Lecture Presentation

Unit 2 Lecture Presentation

 

Loading the player

PROFESSOR: In this unit, we will discuss nature and nurture. If you haven't already completed the Nature or Nurture class activity, please pause this presentation and do that now.

Let's begin with a thought exercise. If scientists cloned you, when that clone grew up, how would the clone be similar to you? How would the clone be different from you? Please pause the video to consider your answer before you continue.

When students answer this question, they often focus on biologically driven similarities, such as height, hair color, and eye color. They also focus on experience-driven differences, mentioning things like different friends, different parents, or experience with different technologies.

Many students think that their clones would look like them, but not necessarily act or think like they do. Think back for a moment to the class activity. Which parts of who we are did you and your classmates attribute to biology? Which did you attribute to experience? Which is more important in making us who we are?

The debate about which matters more, biological or experiential factors, is called the nature versus nurture debate. Nurture, or experience, clearly matters quite a bit. Take, for example, the sad case of Genie. Genie—not her real name—was profoundly neglected and abused until she was a young teenager. She was kept alone in a room. Because of this isolation, she had virtually no social interaction and she did not learn to speak during her childhood.

Nature, or biology, also matters quite a bit. Many of you may be familiar with Down syndrome, a disorder caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. The presence of that extra chromosome causes learning disabilities. These are extreme cases that show that both nature and nurture matter. Which one matters more?

Rather than asking which is more important, a better question is to ask how the two interact to make us who we are. Let's take Albert Einstein as a working example. We can probably all agree that he was brilliant. What made him so smart? Was it nature? Was it nurture? He probably started with some biological advantages. But he likely also had a number of opportunities that helped him to make the most of his potential.

This illustrates what is called a reaction range. The reaction range is the idea that biology provides constraints, but the environment will determine where you fall within those constraints. Let's return to intelligence as our example.

Biology may determine that a child's IQ will fall somewhere between, say, 90 and 110. If that child is reared in an environment in which her opportunities for learning are limited, she may end up toward the bottom of that range. If she is given many opportunities, however, she may end up toward the top of that range.

It is important to note that, for some things, opportunities are more valuable when they occur at the right time. Think back to the description of Genie, the abused child who did not learn to speak as a child. Even when she did eventually hear a language, she never developed the language skills that all of us share, because she was not exposed to language early enough.

This is the idea of a critical window, or a critical period, the idea that your brain is ready to make the most of opportunities when they occur during certain times of childhood. For example, we know that there are critical periods for vision, language learning, second language learning, learning a musical instrument, and learning to read.

We know that nature and nurture can work together. They can also influence each other. Our nature can affect our nurture. For example, some people are uncomfortable in warmer weather, and that might motivate them to seek out cooler climates. This will affect their experiences.

Children who are tall may be encouraged to play sports like basketball and volleyball, while shorter children may be encouraged to participate in different sports or activities. As those of you with children know, each child is born with his or her own temperament or personality. Some children are easier to soothe, for example, and their temperaments may elicit different nurturing experiences from their parents and caregivers.

Nurture can also affect nature. For example, growing up in consistently stressful environments can change the way your brain functions. Over a longer time period, the environment will dictate biology through evolution. If one particular trait makes it likely that people will survive to reproduce in a certain environment, that trait is more likely to be passed on, determining the biology of future generations.

In your core assignments and Digging Deeper assignments, you will learn more about nature and nurture. When you finish these assignments, be sure to check out the Penn State Connections presentation. You will learn some information about Penn State nature/nurture researcher Jenae Neiderhiser, as well as information about World Campus psychology courses that build on the material presented in this unit. 

Unit 2 Penn State Connections (3 of 3)
Unit 2 Penn State Connections

Unit 2 Penn State Connections

 

Loading the player

SPEAKER: Dr. Jenae Neiderhiser is interested in how nature and nurture interact. She is specifically interested in how that interaction plays out in interpersonal relationships. To investigate the nature–nurture interaction, Dr. Neiderhiser studies twins and adoptive families.

In one of Dr. Neiderhiser's published studies, she and her colleagues tried to understand the relationship between parental criticism and somatic symptoms in adolescents. Somatic symptoms are unexplained or undiagnosed physical problems, like headaches.

Parental criticism has been associated with increased somatic symptoms in adolescents, but we weren't sure why. Maybe the symptoms were caused by the criticism or maybe something about the adolescent caused both the symptoms and increased the likelihood of parental criticism. Maybe there were underlying genetic causes of both parental criticism and the somatic symptoms.

In the core lesson, you learned about twin studies. Dr. Neiderhiser and her colleagues studied twins and the children of twins to try to identify the cause. They found an environmental cause. Parental criticism causes the somatic symptoms in teenagers.

If you're interested in reading this article, you can find it in the course space. If you would like to learn more about Dr. Neiderhiser and her work, you can check out her Penn State web page, linked here. If you are interested in nature, nurture, and their interaction, you are in luck. There are a number of World Campus courses that might interest you.

Intro to Developmental Psychology includes some discussion on environmental and genetic influences on growth and change across the life span. Intro to Social Psychology includes information about how our social environments affect our thinking and behavior. Intro to Personality focuses on determinants of personality, both genetic and environmental.

The Neurological Basis of Human Behavior focuses on the biological determinants of behavior. Introduction to Abnormal Psychology, Health Psychology, the Psychology of Fear and Stress, and Child Psychopathology all include information about how our nature and/or our nurture influence our physical and/or psychological health and well-being.

More detailed descriptions of each of these courses can be found in the World Campus course directory.

Article Cited in Unit 2 Penn State Connections Video

Horwitz, B. N., Marceau, K., Narusyte, J., Ganiban, J., Spotts, E. L., Reiss, D., . . . Neiderhiser, J. M. (2015). Parental criticism ​is an environmental influence on adolescent somatic symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(2), 283–289. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000065


Top of page