L03 Case Study Discussion: Exhibits 1-5

Below are exhibits 1-5 that were used at the hearing.

Exhibit 1

In his opinion, AJ Remington referred to the first group as Cluster 1 (unskilled workers) and the second as Cluster 2 (skilled workers). He used Downtown demographics for his consideration of staff composition at SCAM:

Exhibit 1

Category	Downtown	Metroplex	State	USA
White	10.54	70.1	78.38	71.71
Black	82.67	22.8	14.44	12.86
Asian	1.12	0.2	2.58	5.30
Hispanic	7.07	6.2	4.69	16.91

 

Exhibit 2

Based on statistics for the Metroplex as applied to staff composition at SCAM, AJ Remington determined that there were shortfalls in diversity levels. In the table below numbers are displayed in the following format: 20/8 -12. The first number reflects application of demographics. The second number (after the backslash) represents actual numbers. The third number means + or – from what staff composition should be.

Exhibit 2

Category	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian
Labor Pool	20/8 -12	07/28 +12	2/3 +1	0/1 -1
Housekeeping	12/28 -16	22/9 +13	6/4 -2	0/1 -1
Food Service	28/16 -12	29/9 +20	3/3	0/1 -1

 

Exhibit 3

Based on those calculations, AJ Remington concluded that under and overutilization in unskilled categories was as follows:

Exhibit 3

Category	Totals
White	-40
Black	+45
Hispanic	Even
Asian	-3

 

Exhibit 4

AJ Remington’s computations for Cluster 2 – using the same method – resulted in the following:

Exhibit 4

Category	White	Black	Hispanic	Asian
Radiologists	20/20	1/7 -6	2/2	6/1 +5
Psychiatrists	10/11 -1	1/4 -3	1/1	4/0 +4
Surgeons	28/20 +8	1/8 -7	1/2 -1	3/1 +2
Dentists	8/8	1/3 -2	1/7 -6	2/0 +2
Internists	17/12	1/6 -5	3/2 +1	6/1 +5

 

Exhibit 5

Based on those calculations, AJ Remington concluded that representation in medical specialty categories is as follows:

Exhibit 5

Category	Totals
White	+19
Black	-23
Hispanic	-6
Asian	+18

Click on the next page to see exhibits 6-8.