Main Content

Syllabus

The information contained on this page is designed to give students a representative example of material covered in the course. Any information related to course assignments, dates, or course materials is illustrative only. For a definitive list of materials, please check the online catalog 3-4 weeks before the course start date.

LER 400: Comparative Employment Relations Systems

(3.0 Credits.) Analysis of structure and elements of employment relations systems indeveloped and developing areas.

Overview

This course explores contemporary topics in labor and employment relations in the world. The course examines several examples of employment relations systems, each carefully chosen to illustrate important variations in employment relation’s practices. It also provides an overview of economic globalization and its impact on employment relations. Topics on each example will include trade unions and collective bargaining, minimum wage regulation, EEO for women, and temporary migrants/guest workers.

Topics that will be discussed include:

  • The definition and study of ‘employment relations’ (ER).
  • Critical topics (four) in the study of employment relations.
  • Employment relations in selected countries, including comparative analysis that covers both the ‘macro’ level of national systems and the ‘micro’ level of the enterprise/workplace.
  • The role of international agencies/institutions and their impacts on national employment relations systems.
  • The effects of globalisation on employment relations.

Throughout the course, lessons will begin with a description of the learning objectives, along with a brief commentary that introduces and supports the reading assignments. This lesson material will form the basis for assessment. To help you check your own progress and understanding, there will be regular opportunities to take multiple-choice quizzes, short-answer Discussion Board questions and ‘Problem-based learning’ (PBL) exercises.

As participants in this course, some of you will have had more workplace and/or international experience than others. This experience can bring many rich insights into understanding the practical implications of comparative employment relations. The course will allow you to share your experiences and learn from each other. Where possible, you will be asked to share your expertise to maximize your learning experience.

Course Objectives

After successfully completing this course, you will be able to:

  • Define and review the essential concepts in employment relations.
  • Critically evaluate various theories and frameworks of employment relations for their fundamental assumptions, intellectual rigour, and practical value.
  • Recognise and compare employment relations laws and national institutional structures across a number of countries.
  • Locate and access these laws and institutions in their economic, political, cultural and historical context.
  • Analyse the impact of national employment relations laws and institutions on managerial practices and employee representations at the enterprise/workplace level.
  • Identify and define the role of key international agencies and institutions and their effects upon national employment relations systems.

 

Required Course Materials

Most World Campus courses require that students purchase materials (e.g., textbooks, specific software, etc.). To learn about how to order materials, please see the Course Materials page. You should check LionPATH approximately 3–4 weeks before the course begins for a list of required materials.

Library Resources

Many of the University Libraries resources can be utilized from a distance. Through the Libraries website, you can

  • access magazine, journal, and newspaper articles online using library databases;
  • borrow materials and have them delivered to your doorstep—or even your desktop;
  • get research help via email, chat, or phone using the Ask a Librarian service; and
  • much more. 

You must have an active Penn State Access Account to take full advantage of the Libraries' resources and service.  The Off-Campus Users page has additional information about these free services.

Technical Requirements

Technical Requirements
Operating System

Canvas, Penn State's Learning Management System (LMS), supports most recent versions of Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac operating systems. 

To determine if your operating system is supported, please review Canvas' computer specifications.

Browser

Canvas supports the last two versions of every major browser release. It is highly recommended that you update to the newest version of whatever browser you are using.

Please note that Canvas does not support the use of Internet Explorer. Students and instructors should choose a different browser to use.   

To determine if your browser is supported, please review the list of Canvas Supported Browsers.


Note: Cookies must be enabled, and pop-up blockers should be configured to permit new windows from Penn State websites.
Additional Canvas Requirements For a list of software, hardware, and computer settings specifically required by the Canvas LMS, please review Canvas' computer specifications.
Additional Software

All Penn State students have access to Microsoft Office 365, including Microsoft Office applications such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

Students will need a PDF reader, such as Adobe Reader.

Hardware

Monitor: Monitor capable of at least 1024 x 768 resolution
Audio: Microphone, Speakers
Camera (optional, recommended): Standard webcam - many courses may require a webcam for assignments or exam proctoring software.

Mobile Device (optional) The Canvas mobile app is available for versions of iOS and Android. To determine if your device is capable of using the Canvas Mobile App, please review the Canvas Mobile App Requirements.


Student Education Experience Questionnaire (SEEQ)

During the semester you will receive information for completing the Student Education Experience Questionnaire (SEEQ). Your participation is an opportunity to provide anonymous feedback on your learning experience. Your feedback is important because it allows us to understand your experience in this course and make changes to improve the learning experiences of future students. Please monitor email and course communications for links and availability dates.



If you need technical assistance at any point during the course, please contact the Service Desk.

For registration, advising, disability services, help with materials, exams, general problem solving, visit World Campus Student Services!

Course Requirements and Grading

 
Assessments
 
Assessment 1 – Quizzes (Total - 200 points)
 

Assessment Type: Each content lesson in the course includes a quiz. You may take each quiz only ONCE and graded feedback is immediate. The purpose of the quiz is to ensure you have grasped some of the core concepts of the lesson. There will be eight quizzes (8 x 25 points). Each quiz will contain 5 questions, worth 5 points each.

Weighting: 20 %.

 
Assessment 2 – Discussion Board Contributions (Total - 300 points)
 

Assessment Type: Discussion Board Contributions and a copy of the final Contribution submitted to Turnitin (each contribution a maximum of 700 words)

Description: A series of exercises/discussions will test the students’ capacity to consolidate and apply specialised knowledge of employment relations. Students work independently to apply specialised knowledge and expert judgement to the theoretical and practical issues of ER.

Note: This assessment has two parts. To ensure Academic Integrity, each student must ‘cut and paste’ their final contribution and submit it via Turnitin before the Discussion Board is closed.

There will be five core topics that can be addressed. Each contribution will be awarded a mark out of 60.

Weighting: 30 %.

Due Date: Each Discussion Board and final submission via Turnitin will be open for a specific period. You will not be able to contribute to a Discussion Board or submit your written contribution if it is closed. Specific dates will be notified separately.

Length: Each Contribution max 700 words

Submission Method: Contributions to the Discussion Board and final contribution via Turnitin.

Assessment Criteria: Each contribution will be awarded a mark on the following scale: 0 = no contribution; 10-29 = poor; 30 = adequate; 30-40 = good/very good; 50-60 =excellent, based on the assessment criteria below:

  • Answers the question(s)
  • Uses information/evidence to support argument
  • Reports information from required readings/other sources accurately
  • Acknowledges/addresses conflicting data/opposing views
 
Assessment 3 - PBL Exercise 1
 

Assessment Type: Case Study /Problem Based Learning (Total 200 points)

Description: The purpose of this assessment is to reinforce the students understanding of the PBL learning method and of the complex elements of ER/HRM in organisations. Students engage in critical thinking to analyse the issues in the PBL cases. They display professional proficiency of information and technology to identify relevant literature. Students use effective written communication skills to make and justify persuasive recommendations.

Weighting: 20%

Length: 1500 word report, excluding references and appendices.

Due Date: see course scedule

Submission Method: Online via Turnitin

Assessment Criteria:

The assessment criteria are as follows:

A. Scoping of the issues (20% of the total mark)

B. Substantive content (40% of the total mark)

C. Response to the issues (40% of the total mark)

Note: There are also additional essential requirements-more information on the course Canvas site.

Return Method: Via Turnitin

Feedback Provided: Online - To individuals, online through Canvas.

 
Assessment 4 - PBL Exercise 2
 

Assessment Type: Case Study /Problem Based Learning (Total 300 points)

Description: This assignment assesses students ability to define and critically analyse complex issues in Employment Relations. Students apply decision making skills that incorporate ethical, social and global issues when critically analysing employment relations in at least five global economies. After identifying the relevant literature, students interpret, challenge and defend competing ER models to make and justify persuasive conclusions.

Weighting: 30%

Length: 3,000  word report, excluding references and appendices.

Due Date: see course schedule

Assessment Criteria:

The assessment criteria are as follows:

A. Scoping of the issues (20% of the total mark)

B. Substantive content (40% of the total mark)

C. Response to the issues (40% of the total mark)

Note: There are also additional essential requirements-more information on the course Canvas site.

Return Method: Via Turnitin

Feedback Provided: Online - To individuals, online through Canvas.

You are required to submit your paper to TURNITIN before turning it into the instructor. TURNITIN is a program that analyzes content of papers for originality and property citing of sources. It is used in this course primarily to help you identify any problems of excessive or uncited material from other sources. The Instructor Manual available on the TURNITIN Web site provides directions for instructors to follow on setting up a class account, and the Student Manual provides directions for you to access the services via that account. Click on the appropriate links and follow the step-by-step procedures in each manual on Getting Started and Plagiarism Prevention. Your instructor will supply you with the class ID, password and other pertinent information.

Students please note: The School of Labor and Employment Relations does not view Wikipedia as a valid source for information cited in academic work. It can be a useful tool for quickly finding general information on subjects or as a starting point for research. However, students should not cite Wikipedia as a source in papers, reports, assignments, etc.

*Note: if any assignments are submitted after the scheduled deadline, these will be marked down by half a letter grade for each day that they are late (unless otherwise agreed in advance with the instructor).

Surveys

You will be expected to complete two surveys: the Mid-Course Survey and the End-of-Course Survey. Please take the time to provide as much information as possible, as your input is used to enhance the course for future offerings. Responses to the survey do not affect your grade.

Grading

Please refer to the University Grading Policy for Undergraduate Courses for additional information about University grading policies.

Grading Criteria
AssignmentPoints
Individual Assignment – PBL1200
Individual Assignment – PBL2300
Quizzes (8 – 25 points each)200
Discussion Boards (5 – 60 points each)300
Course Total1000
 

The World Campus follows the same grading system as the Penn State resident program. The system is as follows:

Grades of A, B, C, D, and F indicate the following qualities of academic performance:

Grading System
GradeIndication
A (Excellent)Indicates exceptional achievement
B (Good)Indicates extensive achievement
C (Satisfactory)Indicates acceptable achievement
D (Poor)Indicates only minimal achievement
F (Failure)Indicates inadequate achievement necessitating a repetition of the course in order to secure credit
Grading Scale
Letter GradePoints
A930-1000
A-900-929
B+870-899
B840-869
B-800-839
C+770-799
C700-769
D600-699
F599-below

Course Schedule

Note: All due dates reflect North American eastern time (ET).

Course Schedule Note: Pay special attention to each lesson time frame. Assignments are due the last day of the lesson time frame unless otherwise noted.
Lesson 1: Course Introduction and Introduction to Employment Relations

Topics:

  • Course Introduction
  • What is Employment Relations?

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Bray, M, Waring, P, Cooper, R and Macneil, J (2014) What is employment relations?, Chapter 1 in Employment Relations: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.) Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
  • Bray, M, Waring, P, Cooper, R and Macneil, J (2014). The study of employment relations: Analytical tools, Chapter 2 in Employment Relations: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wailes, N, Wright, C, Bamber, G and Lansbury, R (2016) Introduction: An internationally comparative approach to employment relations, Chapter 1, pp. 3-5. International and Comparative Employment Relations, (6th edn). Sydney: Allen & Unwin

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Academic Integrity Statement
  • Introduce Yourself
  • Practice Activity
  • Practice Quiz
Lesson 2: History and Values in ER

Topics:

  • Values in ER

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Bray, M, Waring, P, Cooper, R and Macneil, J (2014). The study of employment relations: Values, Chapter 3 in Employment Relations: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
  • Budd, J and Bhave, D (2012), ‘Values, Ideologies, and Frames of Reference in Industrial Relations’, Chapter 5, in P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, Sage, London.

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Discussion - Exercise: Values in Action: Costco versus Walmart
Lesson 3: Four Issues

Topics:

  • Introduction to:
    • Unions
    • Minimum wages
    • EEO
    • Temporary migrants

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Gospel, H. (2008) ‘Trade unions in theory and practice: Perspectives from advanced industrial countries’ in J. Benson & Y. Zhu (eds), Trade Unions in Asia, Routledge, Hoboken, Chapter 2.
  • Eyraud, F. & Saget, C. (2005). Introduction & Chapter 1, in The Fundamentals of Minimum Wage Fixing. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  • International Labour Organization (2003). Part II, Chapter 2: ‘Policy issues and interventions’, in Time for equality at work: Global report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva: ILO

Other:

  • McGovern, P. (2007). Immigration, Labour Markets and Employment Relations: Problems and Prospects, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45 (2), pp. 217–235.

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 1, 2, 3
Lesson 4: ER in Australia

Topics:

  • Australia overview

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Wright, C and Lansbury, D (2016) ‘Employment Relations in Australia’, in G. Bamber et al. (eds), International and Comparative Employment Relations, SAGE, London, 6th Edition. Chapter 5.

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • None
Lesson 5: Australia and the Four ER Issues

Topics:

  • Australia and the four ER issues

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Rees, N., Lindsay, K. & Rice, S. (2008) Australian Anti-Discrimination Law, Federation Press, Sydney, Chapter 1, pages 1-8.
  • Crock, M, Howe, S and McCallum, R (2014), ‘Conflicted Priorities? Enforcing Fairness for Temporary Migrant Workers in Australia’, in C. Costello and M. Freedland (eds) Migrants at Work: Immigration and Vulnerability in Labour Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Chapter 22.

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 4,5
Lesson 6: ER in the USA

Topics:

  • USA overview

Readings:

Textbook:

  • Friedman

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • PBL1
Lesson 7: The USA and the Four ER Issues

Topics:

  • The USA and the four ER issues

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Ivancevich, J (2008) Equal Employment Opportunity: Legal Aspects of HRM. Chapter 3, Human Resource Management (11th ed). Boston, McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Other:

  • Kaufman, B (2010) Institutional Economics and the Minimum Wage: Broadening the Theoretical and Policy Debate, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63 (3), April, pp. 427- 53.

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 6, 7
Lesson 8: ER in China

Topics:

  • China overview

Readings:

Textbook:

  • Liu

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Discussion - Exercise: The minimum wage in China
Lesson 9: China and the Four ER Issues

Topics:

  • China and the four ER issues

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • Roberts, C (2012) ‘Far from a Harmonious Society: Employment Discrimination in China’, Santa Clara Law Review, 32: 1531-1560

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 8, 9
Lesson 10: ER in Germany

Topics:

  • Germany overview

Readings:

Textbook:

  • Behrens

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Discussion - Exercise: Strategies to address union decline in Germany
Lesson 11: Germany and the Four ER Issues

Topics:

  • Germany and the four ER issues

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 10, 11
Lesson 12: ER in Saudi Arabia

Topics:

  • Saudi Arabia overview

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • Mellahi, K. (2006) ‘Human resource management in Saudi Arabia’ in P. Budhwar & K. Mellahi (eds), Managing Human Resources in the Middle East, Routledge, Hoboken. Chapter 6.

Other:

  • None

Assignments:

  • None
Lesson 13: Saudi Arabia and the Four ER Issues

Topics:

  • Saudi Arabia and the four ER issues

Readings:

Textbook:

  • None

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • McCormack, S, Larsen, J and Husn, H 2015, ‘The Other Migrant Crisis’ Policy Research Report, International Organization for Migration, Geneva.
  • Murray, H 2012, 'Hope for Reform Springs Eternal: How the Sponsorship System, Domestic Laws and Traditional Customs Fail to Protect Migrant Domestic Workers in GCC Countries' Cornell International Law Journal 45(2).

Assignments:

  • Quiz: Lessons 12, 13
Lesson 14: Globalization

Topics:

  • Globalization and Employment Relations

Readings:

Textbook:

  • Kuruvilla, S and Lakhani, T. Chapter 20.
  • Fichter, Chapter 21.

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • Yu, X (2008) ‘Impacts of Corporate Code of Conduct on Labor Standards: A Case Study of Reebok’s Athletic Footwear Supplier Factory in China’, Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 513-529

Assignments:

  • Discussion - Exercise: Globalization and regulation
  • Quiz: Lesson 14
  • Final Paper - PBL2
Lesson 15: International Agencies

Topics:

  • International Agencies

Readings:

Textbook:

  • Ewing, Chapter 23.

Course Reserves:

  • None

Other:

  • Hughes, S. (2005). The International Labour Organisation, New Political Economy, 10 (3), pp. 413-25.

Assignments:

  • Discussion - Exercise: The ILO and ER
  • Quiz: Lesson 15

Note: If you are planning to graduate this semester, please communicate your intent to graduate to your instructor. This will alert your instructor to the need to submit your final grade in time to meet the published graduation deadlines. For more information about graduation policies and deadlines, please go to the Graduation Information on the My Penn State Online Student Portal.

Formal instruction will end on the last day of class. Provided that you have an active Penn State Access Account user ID and password, you will continue to be able to access the course materials for one year, starting from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered (with the exception of library reserves and other external resources that may have a shorter archival period). After one year, you might be able to access the course based on the policies of the program or department offering the course material, up to a maximum of three years from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered. For more information, please review the University Course Archival Policy.

Academic Integrity

According to Penn State policy G-9: Academic Integrity , an academic integrity violation is “an intentional, unintentional, or attempted violation of course or assessment policies to gain an academic advantage or to advantage or disadvantage another student academically.” Unless your instructor tells you otherwise, you must complete all course work entirely on your own, using only sources that have been permitted by your instructor, and you may not assist other students with papers, quizzes, exams, or other assessments. If your instructor allows you to use ideas, images, or word phrases created by another person (e.g., from Course Hero or Chegg) or by generative technology, such as ChatGPT, you must identify their source. You may not submit false or fabricated information, use the same academic work for credit in multiple courses, or share instructional content. Students with questions about academic integrity should ask their instructor before submitting work.

Students facing allegations of academic misconduct may not drop/withdraw from the affected course unless they are cleared of wrongdoing (see G-9: Academic Integrity ). Attempted drops will be prevented or reversed, and students will be expected to complete course work and meet course deadlines. Students who are found responsible for academic integrity violations face academic outcomes, which can be severe, and put themselves at jeopardy for other outcomes which may include ineligibility for Dean’s List, pass/fail elections, and grade forgiveness. Students may also face consequences from their home/major program and/or The Schreyer Honors College.

How Academic Integrity Violations Are Handled
World Campus students are expected to act with civility and personal integrity; respect other students' dignity, rights, and property; and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their own efforts. An environment of academic integrity is requisite to respect for oneself and others, as well as a civil community.

In cases where academic integrity is questioned, the Policy on Academic Integrity indicates that procedure requires an instructor to inform the student of the allegation. Procedures allow a student to accept or contest a charge. If a student chooses to contest a charge, the case will then be managed by the respective college or campus Academic Integrity Committee. If that committee recommends an administrative sanction (Formal Warning, Conduct Probation, Suspension, Expulsion), the claim will be referred to the Office of Student Accountability and Conflict Response.

All Penn State colleges abide by this Penn State policy, but review procedures may vary by college when academic dishonesty is suspected. Information about Penn State's academic integrity policy and college review procedures is included in the information that students receive upon enrolling in a course. To obtain that information in advance of enrolling in a course, please contact us by going to the Contacts & Help page .

Accommodating Disabilities

Penn State welcomes students with disabilities into the University's educational programs. Every Penn State campus has resources for students with disabilities. The Student Disability Resources (SDR) website provides contacts for disability services at every Penn State campus. For further information, please visit the SDR website.

In order to apply for reasonable accommodations, you must contact the appropriate disability resources office at the campus where you are officially enrolled, participate in an intake interview, and provide documentation based on the documentation guidelines. If the documentation supports your request for reasonable accommodations, your campus's disability resources office will provide you with an accommodation letter. Please share this letter with your instructors and discuss the accommodations with them as early in your courses as possible. You must follow this process for every semester that you request accommodations.

Additional Policies

For information about additional policies regarding Penn State Access Accounts; credit by examination; course tuition, fees, and refund schedules; and drops and withdrawals, please see the World Campus Student Center website.

If you have a crisis or safety concern, mental health services are available to you as a Penn State student. Crisis and emergency contacts are available, no matter where you are located:


Top of page