Lesson 4 begins a series of lessons that drills down into the day-to-day functions for which HR professionals are responsible. This lesson discusses the ways in which an organization can analyze and organize jobs in the work place. For most of us the result of these activities is the job description which we receive to help define the variety of roles we will play as well as the knowledge, skills and behaviors required to perform those roles successfully.
Upon successful completion of this lesson, you should be able to
By the end of this lesson, make sure you have completed the readings and activities found in the Lesson 4 Course Schedule.
To begin an effective recruiting process, requires an organization to engage in extensive research and analysis. As examples, the organization must answer at least two important questions.
Incumbents at every level within an organizational hierarchy represent a mosaic of knowledge and skills defining a variety of “jobs”. Many skills, for example, are shared by many apparently unrelated jobs. For example, what types of skills might a surgeon and admissions clerk share in a hospital? In order to perform their roles well they must both be skilled in communicating effectively. In this respect clearly articulating a message, actively listening, expressing empathy are all elements in this skill set. That doesn’t mean that the admissions clerk, even if having mastered the communications skill set, is qualified to perform surgery, nor that the surgeon is sufficiently patient to conduct in-take in an emergency room.
Therefore, two processes that precede the ability to recruit job candidates are:
The reading in the text provides a comprehensive discussion of the various ways in which organizations can engage in job analysis. According to the text, analysis is, “the process of getting detailed information about jobs”. In some cases we analyze jobs as we create new positions within a company. In other cases we will periodically reassess existing jobs, understanding that within existing roles, there may be shifting responsibilities that require different skills and/or knowledge to appropriately perform.
Job descriptions help incumbents understand the range of responsibilities they will assume at work. Consider the following example:
Tasks
Knowledge
Skills
If you visit the O-Net Online site you can see the even larger varieties of information that has been accumulated with respect to this particular title.
What is most interesting is that all by itself the job description might easily distinguish one job title from another. For example, one could compare the description of the HR Specialist with the HR Manager. Certainly there may be some overlap in tasks, knowledge, skills; however, one can easily distinguish between the nature of the two positions.
It is much more difficult to determine the exact job responsibilities of every person employed as a Human Resources Specialist. For example, in a large HR Office a person in this title might focus almost entirely on EEO work, while another person in the same title would spend most of her time recruiting. In a much smaller office the incumbent might be required to dabble in each task area, in essence the “jack of all trades, master of none”.
In other words, a job description may set some clear parameters concerning the nature of the job, but all by itself does not clearly define anyone’s specific job responsibilities within the title itself.