PL SC 490

Course Syllabus
Course Syllabus

The information contained on this page is designed to give students a representative example of material covered in the course. Any information related to course assignments, dates, or course materials is illustrative only. For a definitive list of materials, please check the online catalog 3-4 weeks before the course start date.

PL SC 490 Public Policy-Making and Evaluation (3): Advanced analysis of public policy, emphasizing policy evaluation and the factors that determine policy success and failure. Prerequisites: PL SC 001, PL SC 002, or PUBPL 304W



Overview

Public policy affects the lives of all citizens of organized societies. Therefore, PLSC 490 provides an in-depth study of the public policy-making and evaluation processes. The course is designed to provide the organizational context in which public policy is made including the processes of public policy formulation, implementation, evaluation, and modification. Since virtually all government goods and services are products of public policies their resulting impact on society is a crucial component of policy analysis and evaluation. This course provides a detailed discussion of the various institutions and actors involved in the policy-making process thereby providing an analytical perspective upon which to evaluate what government does, why it does it, and what difference it makes, if any. Students will employ the rational comprehensive analytical technique using the process model as a representative framework for discussion and evaluation: problem identification, agenda setting, policy formulation, policy adoption, policy implementation, policy evaluation, and policy change or termination. Students will focus on the policy actors, institutions, and instruments with the objective of providing policy relevant information that can be used to solve complex public policy problems. Additionally, the student will develop an understanding of the ethical and professional standards that a policy analyst should maintain. Critical analysis and evaluation of public policies can have a significant effect on the outcome and impact of these policies. Acquiring the knowledge and skills involved in analyzing and evaluating public policies gives the policy analyst a better understanding of why some policies succeed while others fail. The methods of teaching used in this course consist of an online study guide and individual student readings. Assessments are performed throughout the course and consist of short papers at the conclusion of each lesson and one major course paper due on the first day of the last week of the course.


Course Objectives

By the time you complete this course, you should have learned about the following:

  • Understand the nature, structure, and division of political power of American Federalism
  • Understand how and why public policies are made
  • Understand the policy-making process
  • Develop a familiarity with the rational policy analysis process.
  • Understand how and why public policies need to be analyzed and evaluated.
  • Develop an understanding of the various value and ethical decisions involved throughout the 7 stage public policy-making process.
  • Improve existing study, research, writing, and presentation skills.

Required Course Materials

Most World Campus courses require that students purchase materials (e.g., textbooks, specific software, etc.). To learn about how to order materials, please see the Course Materials page. You should check LionPATH approximately 3–4 weeks before the course begins for a list of required materials.


Library Resources

Many of the University Libraries resources can be utilized from a distance. Through the Libraries website, you can

  • access magazine, journal, and newspaper articles online using library databases;
  • borrow materials and have them delivered to your doorstep—or even your desktop;
  • get research help via email, chat, or phone using the Ask a Librarian service; and
  • much more. 

You must have an active Penn State Access Account to take full advantage of the Libraries' resources and service.  The Off-Campus Users page has additional information about these free services.


Technical Specifications

Technical Requirements
Operating System Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8*; Mac OS X 10.5 or higher
*Windows 8 support excludes the tablet only RT version
Processor 2 GHz or higher
Memory 1 GB of RAM
Hard Drive Space 20 GB free disk space
Browser We recommend the latest ANGEL-supported version of Firefox or Internet Explorer. To determine if your browser fits this criterion, and for advice on downloading a supported version, please refer to the following ITS knowledge base article: Supported Browsers and Recommended Computers.
Note: Cookies, Java, and JavaScript must be enabled. Pop-up blockers should be configured to permit new windows
from Penn State websites.

Due to nonstandard handling of CSS, JavaScript and caching,
older versions of Internet Explorer (such as IE 6 or earlier) do not work with our courses.
Plug-ins Adobe Reader [Download from Adobe]
Flash Player (v7.0 or later) [Download from Adobe]
Additional Software Microsoft Office (2007 or later)
Internet Connection Broadband (cable or DSL) connection required
Printer Access to graphics-capable printer
DVD-ROM Required
Sound Card, Microphone, and Speakers Required
Monitor Capable of at least 1024 x 768 resolution

If you need technical assistance at any point during the course, please contact the Service Desk.

For registration, advising, disability services, help with materials, exams, general problem solving, visit World Campus Student Services!


Course Requirements

NOTE: Academic Integrity: is the pursuit of scholarly activity free from fraud and deception and is an educational objective of this institution. All University policies regarding academic integrity apply to this course. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarizing, fabricating of information or citations, facilitating acts of academic dishonesty by others, having unauthorized possession of examinations, submitting work of another person or work previously used without informing the instructor, or tampering with the academic work of other students. For any material or ideas obtained from other sources, such as the text or things you see on the web, in the library, etc., a source reference must be given. Direct quotes from any source must be identified as such. All exam answers must be your own, and you must not provide any assistance to other students during exams. Any instances of academic dishonesty WILL RESULT IN A FAILING GRADE FOR THE COURSE.

Assigned Readings: Students are expected to read the Study Guide material and each assigned reading as provided in the course outline. Also, students should get into the habit of reading a daily newspaper and/or weekly news magazines and scholarly journals since many of the course assignments will relate to contemporary issues.

Discussion Participation: Students will be required to participate regularly in the course Discussion Forums: posting reflections on readings and assignments, responding to questions from the instructor, responding and reflecting on the posts of other students.

Policy Evaluation Paper: Each student will produce a policy evaluation paper. The paper will describe and critically analyze a public policy issue of the student’s choice which must be approved by the course professor. The student must select a substantive policy issue with the issue being as broad, e.g. national transportation policy, or as specific, e.g. the placement of a specific local or state highway, as you would like. The student must analyze the issue using at a minimum the theories and research that are presented throughout the course. The student paper will employ the course material to explain the policy-making process involved with their specific policy issue and especially as it pertains to the policy evaluation of that policy issue. Students must email their proposed topic to the instructor no later than September 08, 2008 for approval. The paper is due no later than December 15, 2008.

In general, the policy issue papers are to be typed and double-spaced, with one inch margins. The paper will be a minimum of 15 pages of text, exclusive of notes and bibliography pages, which must be included. The student is responsible for the content and presentation of the paper. Incomplete sentences, faulty paragraphs, and misspelled words are often signs of poor writing and lack of attention to detail; therefore, be especially careful to proofread your paper before submitting it. Finally, grammar and presentation are essential elements of all writing but especially when presenting analysis to policy makers, consequently, grammar and presentation will be considered when determining the overall grade for the paper. Parenthetical notes are required in order to give proper credit to other authors for the use of their materials and/or ideas. The failure to provide notes which documents your sources will constitute plagiarism because you are using another’s work as if it is your own. A helpful suggestion is, when in doubt, cite. Footnotes or endnotes will be used only to expound on the text. Any submitted paper which has been, in part or whole, plagiarized will receive a grade of zero. The Policy Evaluation Paper is a major portion of your course grade and is worth 300 points or 30 percent of your final grade.


Course Schedule

The information contained on this page is designed to give students a representative example of material covered in the course. Any information related to course assignments, dates, or course materials is illustrative only. For a definitive list of materials, please check the online catalog 3-4 weeks before the course start date.

Unit Topic Assignment
1 & 2 Introduction to Public Policy-Making and Evaluation Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapters 1, 2, 4, & 5
Read: Peters: Chapter 1
3 & 4 The Structure of Policy-Making in American Government Read: U.S. Constitution: Articles 1 through 7, and Amendments 1 through 27
Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapter 3
Read: Peters: Chapter 2
Read: Lowi, et al: Chapter 3
Read: Bardach: Appendix B and C
5 & 6 Public Policy-Making: Problem Identification and Agenda-Setting Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapters 6, 7, 13, and 14
Read: Peters: Chapter 3 (pages 47 through 62)
Read: Bardach: Introduction and Part 1 (Steps 1 and 2, pages 1 through 15)
7 & 8 Public Policy-Making: Formulation and Adoption (Legitimizing) Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapters 8, 9, 15, and 16
Read: Peters: Chapter 3 (pages 62 through 74) and Chapter 4
9 & 10 Public Policy-Making: Implementation, Evaluation, and Termination Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapters 10, 11, 12, 17, and 18
Read: Peters: Chapters 5 and 7
11 & 12 Policy Evaluation Continued Read: Theodoulou and Kofinis: Chapter 19
Read: Peters: Chapters 6, 16, and 17
Read: Bardach: Part 1 (Steps 3 through 8, pages 15 through 59)
13 & 14 Policy Evaluation: Substantive Public Policy Issues Read: Peters: Chapters 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15
  Thanksgiving Break
15 Final Policy Evaluation Paper Period Read: Bardach: Parts 2 and 3
NOTE: If you are planning to graduate this semester, please communicate your intent to graduate to your instructor. This will alert your instructor to the need to submit your final grade in time to meet the published graduation deadlines. For more information about graduation policies and deadlines, please see "
Graduation" on the World Campus Student Policies website.

Formal instruction will end on the last day of class. Provided that you have an active Penn State Access Account user ID and password, you will continue to be able to access the course materials for one year, starting from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered (with the exception of library reserves and other external resources that may have a shorter archival period). After one year, you might be able to access the course based on the policies of the program or department offering the course material, up to a maximum of three years from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered. For more information, please review the University Course Archival Policy.


Grading

Each student’s semester grade will be based on the following:

Individual Lesson Policy Papers (100 pts. ea.) 700 pts (70%)
Policy Evaluation Paper 300 pts (30%)
Total 1000 pts (100%)

Letter grades will be assigned according to the following rubric:

A 94-100%
A- 90-93%
B+ 87-89%
B 84-86%
B- 80-83%
C+ 77-79%
C 74-76%
C- 70-73%
D+ 67-69%
D 64-66%
D- 60-63%
F Below 60%

The World Campus follows the same grading system as the Penn State resident program. The grades of A, B, C, D, and F indicate the following qualities of academic performance:

A = (Excellent) Indicates exceptional achievement
B = (Good) Indicates extensive achievement
C = (Satisfactory) Indicates acceptable achievement
D = (Poor) Indicates only minimal achievement
F = (Failure) Indicates inadequate achievement necessitating a repetition of the course in order to secure credit

Please refer to the
University Grading Policy for Undergraduate Courses for additional information about University grading policies. If, for reasons beyond the student's control, a student is prevented from completing a course within the prescribed time, the grade in that course may be deferred with the concurrence of the instructor. The symbol DF appears on the student's transcript until the course has been completed. Non-emergency permission for filing a deferred grade must be requested by the student before the beginning of the final examination period. In an emergency situation, an instructor can approve a deferred grade after the final exam period has started. Under emergency conditions during which the instructor is unavailable, authorization is required from one of the following: the dean of the college in which the candidate is enrolled; the executive director of the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division or is a provisional student; or the campus chancellor of the student's associated Penn State campus.

For additional information please refer to the Deferring a Grade page.

Academic Integrity

According to Penn State policy G-9: Academic Integrity , an academic integrity violation is “an intentional, unintentional, or attempted violation of course or assessment policies to gain an academic advantage or to advantage or disadvantage another student academically.” Unless your instructor tells you otherwise, you must complete all course work entirely on your own, using only sources that have been permitted by your instructor, and you may not assist other students with papers, quizzes, exams, or other assessments. If your instructor allows you to use ideas, images, or word phrases created by another person (e.g., from Course Hero or Chegg) or by generative technology, such as ChatGPT, you must identify their source. You may not submit false or fabricated information, use the same academic work for credit in multiple courses, or share instructional content. Students with questions about academic integrity should ask their instructor before submitting work.

Students facing allegations of academic misconduct may not drop/withdraw from the affected course unless they are cleared of wrongdoing (see G-9: Academic Integrity ). Attempted drops will be prevented or reversed, and students will be expected to complete course work and meet course deadlines. Students who are found responsible for academic integrity violations face academic outcomes, which can be severe, and put themselves at jeopardy for other outcomes which may include ineligibility for Dean’s List, pass/fail elections, and grade forgiveness. Students may also face consequences from their home/major program and/or The Schreyer Honors College.

How Academic Integrity Violations Are Handled
World Campus students are expected to act with civility and personal integrity; respect other students' dignity, rights, and property; and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their own efforts. An environment of academic integrity is requisite to respect for oneself and others, as well as a civil community.

In cases where academic integrity is questioned, the Policy on Academic Integrity indicates that procedure requires an instructor to inform the student of the allegation. Procedures allow a student to accept or contest a charge. If a student chooses to contest a charge, the case will then be managed by the respective college or campus Academic Integrity Committee. If that committee recommends an administrative sanction (Formal Warning, Conduct Probation, Suspension, Expulsion), the claim will be referred to the Office of Student Accountability and Conflict Response.

All Penn State colleges abide by this Penn State policy, but review procedures may vary by college when academic dishonesty is suspected. Information about Penn State's academic integrity policy and college review procedures is included in the information that students receive upon enrolling in a course. To obtain that information in advance of enrolling in a course, please contact us by going to the Contacts & Help page .


Accommodating Disabilities

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Additional Policies


Disclaimer: Please note that the specifics of this Course Syllabus are subject to change, and you will be responsible for abiding by any such changes. Your instructor will notify you of any changes.


[an error occurred while processing this directive]