SPLED525:

Lesson 1: Introduction to Inclusive Settings and Collaboration

Introduction (1 of 12)
Introduction

Introduction


To complete this lesson, please do the following things:

Lesson 1 Objectives

At the end of this lesson, you should be able to do the following things specified in our textbook:

Acronym Activity (2 of 12)
Acronym Activity

Acronym Activity

As you begin this course, you may already be feeling somewhat overwhelmed by the number of acronyms used to describe various components of special education and other related services. The following is a list of some of the common acronyms.  You can complete it after this lesson and see if you improved your acronym language for special education.

Self-Check


Match the acronym to the description by typing corresponding letters into the white boxes.
  • A. ADA
  • B. ADD
  • C. ADHD
  • D. ED
  • E. EHA
  • F. ETI
  • G. FAPE
  • H. HI
  • I. IDEA
  • J. IEP
  • K. IFSP
  • L. LRE
  • M. OHI
  • N. SLD
  • O. TBI
  • P. VI

 

Solution
ADA
Americans With Disabilities Act
ADD
attention deficit disorder
ADHD
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
ED
emotional disorders
EHA
Education for All Handicapped Act
ETI
response to intervention
FAPE
free and appropriate education
HI
hearing impairment
IDEA
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
IEP
individual education plan
IFSP
individual family service plan
LRE
least restrictive environment
OHI
other health impairments
SLD
specific learning disabilities
TBI
traumatic brain injury
VI
visual impairment
Legal Proceedings and Legislation Timeline (3 of 12)
Legal Proceedings and Legislation Timeline

Legal Proceedings and Legislation Timeline

One of the most influential laws in education was passed in 1975, Public Law 94-142. The impact of that law commonly referred to as the IDEA –Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is still as strong today as it was when it was first passed. IDEA has been amended many times further strengthening the protections afforded to students with disabilities. The law guaranteed that students with disabilities would receive a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment. Without this law, schools were not required to provide students with disabilities educational services. This often led to led to students with disabilities being placed in institutional settings and not public schools.

IDEA specifically identifies schools must provide appropriate educations services for students with autism, deafness and hearing impairments, visual impairments, intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, other health impairments, emotional and behavioral disorders, speech and/or language disorders, traumatic brain injury, specific learning disabilities. These categories have undergone slight revisions with each amendment of IDEA. In addition to these categories, IDEA also provides education protections to students who are culturally or linguistically diverse, students at risk for failure, and gifted and talented students.

Protections for individuals with disabilities did not stop with IDEA, but continued with other court federal laws such as Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The common theme across all of the court rulings and federal laws is the protections provided for individuals with disabilities in education as well as after education.

Read Chapter 1 up to the Models of Service Delivery section and review the interactive timeline on legal cases (adapted from the textbook) before you continue reading.

Open the timeline in full-screen mode.

Types of Services Offered in Special Education (4 of 12)
Types of Services Offered in Special Education

Types of Services Offered in Special Education

A major tent of IDEA was for educators to provide a range of services for students with disabilities that included a variety of options tailored to the specific needs of the students. This service delivery model could include full time placement in the general education classroom to specialized residential programs. The key point of IDEA was that the full range of services had to be considered with a focus on including the student in the general education classroom to the maximum extent possible.

The focus on the general education classroom is often referred to as inclusion. In the instance of “full inclusion” the student is receiving 100% of their education support in the general education classroom. The idea of “full inclusion” as led to a great deal of disagreement in and outside of the field of special education. There are valid points from both perspectives. This section will focus on the continuum of services and the potential advantages and disadvantages.

In Chapter 1 of your e-text, watch the video on examples of the types of services offered in special education. Select one of the types of student services and discuss your thoughts or ideas about how you provide those services to students with disabilities and the challenges that may exist. Make sure you are logged in with your Disqus user ID and post below.

Least Restrictive Environment (5 of 12)
Least Restrictive Environment

Least Restrictive Environment

The least restrictive environment (LRE) is a major point of emphasis in the types of services offered to students and one of the most important principles of IDEA. In the LRE, students with disabilities receive education in a setting close to the general education program that provides the necessary supports to meet their unique needs. 

In Chapter 1 of your e-text, watch the video on the least restrictive environment and discuss the challenges that you face in meeting the conditions of the LRE in your current or future classroom.

 

Inclusion Activity (6 of 12)
Inclusion Activity

Inclusion Activity


After reading the section on inclusion, identify which arguments belong to the proponents of full inclusion and which belong to proponents of the continuum of services. Type A or B into the white boxes below.
  • A. proponents of continuum of services
  • B. proponents of full inclusion

 

Solution
proponents of continuum of services
Many services needed by students with disabilities are not usually available in the general education classroom.
Special services, such as speech therapy, physical therapy, or specialized reading instruction, may be stigmatizing when undertaken in the company of general education peers.
Many general education teachers lack the necessary time and training to make full inclusion a success.
Students with special needs may require materials at lower reading levels, braillers, speech synthesizers, specialized computers, or specialized training materials that general education classrooms lack.
Although research data are to some extent equivocal, clear evidence of the superiority of full-inclusion placements is presently lacking.
proponents of full inclusion
Students with disabilities have a right to be educated alongside their non-disabled peers.
Harmful stigmatizing effects may be associated with students attending special schools or special classrooms.
Students in full-inclusion classrooms improve their interactions with others, learn to communicate better, develop better social skills, and increase their friendships.
Fully included students avoid the disruptive and time-consuming effects of being "pulled out" of the general education class to receive special services.
Including all students in the same classroom is simply the most fair and equitable solution to the problem of placement.
Effective Inclusive Practices Discussion Activity (7 of 12)
Effective Inclusive Practices Discussion Activity

Effective Inclusive Practices Discussion Activity

Inclusion is auspicious to both Teaches and Parents. The potential to include students with disabilities in the general education classroom is both appealing yet very challenging to students as well as teachers. The success of inclusion depends on the amount of teacher training, sufficient planning time, and resources devoted to the inclusion of students with disabilities. These variables vary widely across states, districts, and schools. In general, researchers have documented that when appropriate resources and supports are provided, educators, parents, and students develop positive attitudes towards inclusion. Without these resources and supports, inclusion poses significant challenges to teachers, students, and parents.

Obviously, one major factor in the overall effectiveness of inclusive practices is the general education teacher. Regardless of what the law says, the importance of preparing general education teachers the necessary supports to meet the needs of students with disabilities is extremely important, but also is very challenging.

After reading the section on Teacher Attitudes Toward Inclusion and watching the video (in your e-text) on the items that need to be present for effective inclusive practices, discuss the following questions:

  1. Why do you think attitudes toward inclusion have changed so little over the years?
  2. How might overall attitudes toward inclusion be improved?
  3. Why do you think elementary-grade teachers report more positive attitudes than secondary-grade teachers?
  4. Do you think the high-stakes testing and teacher-value-added accountability initiatives will help or hurt attitudes towards inclusion?
Quiz 1 (8 of 12)
Quiz 1

Quiz 1

Complete and submit Lesson 1 Quiz 1 by the due date (see syllabus). 

Active Listening Strategy for Teachers Discussion Activity (9 of 12)
Active Listening Strategy for Teachers Discussion Activity

Active Listening Strategy for Teachers Discussion Activity

According to our textbook, teachers must learn to use such techniques as "active listening, depersonalizing situations, identifying common goals and solutions, and monitoring progress to achieve those goals." Student progress can be monitored through a technique called summarization, which "makes the entire conversation positive and concrete. A goal statement is made, possible solutions are listed, one is selected for implementation and evaluation, and f ollow-up target dates are set".

Watch the following video on the importance of effective communication with parents.

Transcript coming soon!

On pages 27 to 30, the authors of our textbook list general strategies for effective communicating, which include

  1. using active listening techniques,
  2. depersonalizing situations,
  3. finding common goals,
  4. brainstorming possible solutions,
  5. summarizing goals and solutions, and
  6. following up to monitor progress.

The active listening strategy for teachers described in the Research Highlight on page 29 is an effective communication strategy for teachers to use when meeting with parents. The strategy is called LAFF:

L = Listen, empathize, and communicate with respect.

A = Ask questions and ask permission to take notes at the meeting.

F = Focus on the problem or issues and summarize these issues as described by the parent.

F = Find a first step by identifying and agreeing upon appropriate procedures and how they will be implemented.

"Positive partnerships with parents" benefit students' education (p. 45). As our textbook authors discuss, teachers need to be aware of variability in backgrounds and family structures that might present challenges to positive communication. Partnerships with parents and families can include communicating about homework, resolving disagreements, establishing parent advisory groups, and handling disability-related issues (pp. 45–47).

Transcript coming soon!

After viewing the videos, reading the section on effective communication, and reading the Research Highlight (An Active Listening Strategy for Teachers, p. 29), post responses to the following questions:

  1. What mistakes do you think teachers make when conferring with parents?
  2. Why do you think the LAFF strategy is helpful?
  3. What does "Don't CRY" add to the LAFF strategy?
Team Members Activity (10 of 12)
Team Members Activity

Team Members Activity

Match the team member to the correct description.
  • A. counselors
  • B. general education teachers
  • C. occupational therapists
  • D. other school specialists
  • E. paraprofessionals
  • F. physical therapists
  • G. school administrators
  • H. school nurses
  • I. school psychologists
  • J. social workers
  • K. special education teachers
  • L. speech/language therapists

 

Solution
counselors
advise students; may conduct some social and emotional assessments
general education teachers
responsible for teaching grade-level content in any subject area and responsible for implementing part or all of a student's IEP
occupational therapists
provide assessment and interventions for students in the fine motor areas
other school specialists
provide assistance in specialized ways
paraprofessionals
provide assistance to teachers, special education teachers, and students with disabilities
physical therapists
provide assessment and interventions in gross motor areas
school administrators
provide administrative assistance among all involved
school nurses
often provide medical histories and distribute medications to students
school psychologists
take the lead on the education evaluation
social workers
provide the link between families and schools
special education teachers
teach any grade level and any disability area K–12; may teach in a variety of settings; usually have the primary responsibility for implementing the student's IEP
speech/language therapists
work with students who require assistance with any speech and/or language needs; may deliver services at the student's home
Collaboration and Partnerships (11 of 12)
Collaboration and Partnerships

Collaboration and Partnerships

An important aspect of providing a continuum of services to students with disabilities is the extent to which a special and general education teacher are able to collaborate. This is often referred to as “Consultation” and takes many different forms depending on the specific needs of the students with disabilities. One of the more common forms of this collaboration between general and special education occurs in a co-teaching structure where a general and special education teacher are paired together in one classroom. Co-teaching presents many challenges, but is especially challenging at the secondary levels.

Watch this video on co-teaching and focus on the importance of a shared relationship to facilitate positive partnerships.

Transcript coming soon!

Shared respect and collaboration are essential ingredients for effective co-teaching. A co-teaching classroom offers many advantages for both students and teachers. The success of the inclusive classroom often hinges on the two teachers and their collaboration. View the second video on co-teaching and pay attention to how co-taught classrooms can positively impact student learning through flexible grouping and formative assessment.

Transcript coming soon!

If co-teachers are able to collaborate in a positive fashion, their co-taught classroom can take many different structures that will positively impact all students.

Quiz 2 (12 of 12)
Quiz 2

Quiz 2

Complete and submit Lesson 1 Quiz 2 by the due date (see syllabus). 


Top of page