Main Content

3: National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets

Testing the Strategy

Another important aspect of the strategic appraisal and strategy development process is that of testing the draft strategy (i.e., assessing each of the ends, ways and means according to their overall capability to achieve a specific task). The three criterion below capture the key points. These are generally expressed as:

  • Suitability (ends/objectives): Does this strategy present the most suitable policy elements/instruments for doing this?
  • Acceptability (ways/concepts): Is there sufficient political and public support to legitimize (accept) the proposed actions?
  • Feasibility (means/resources): Are the proposed ways (concepts) achievable considering the current and potential capabilities and means (resources)?

It's been ten years since the strategy was developed. I'd like you to consider whether the strategy met the criteria above in 2003 and whether it meets the criteria in 2014.  Dig. Look closely at the document and consider whether or not additional language is needed to strengthen it.

In addition, please remember that your analysis of the document will differ based on your vantage point. The federal response will be different than that given by state, local, and tribal officials, and the private sector. Please consider these differences and ways to address them.


Top of page