Main Content

Syllabus

The information contained on this page is designed to give students a representative example of material covered in the course. Any information related to course assignments, dates, or course materials is illustrative only. For a definitive list of materials, please check the online catalog 3-4 weeks before the course start date.

 ​

LDT 566 Using Technology to Enhance Learning Process (3 credits): Amplifying thinking or organizing mental functions with computers.

Prerequisites: None. Some familiarity with educational technology, communication, or social network analysis would be beneficial but is not required.



Overview

Computers have a long history of supporting thinking and learning both within and outside of school settings; as such, many emerging technologies have been studied in various forms in the past. With this history comes some controversy over 

  • the utility of different technological tools, 
  • the ways that computers should be used to support learning, and 
  • the tradeoffs associated with different approaches to using computing technology to support learning.

Thus, it is important to be strategic with and critical of technology use. You need to ask important questions:

  • What does emerging technology mean?
  • What can be lost and gained when technology is used to support learning?
  • What is the role of the teacher (beliefs, practices, and expertise), and what is the teacher's impact in a technology-enhanced classroom?
  • What are important design considerations for how technology is incorporated into educational settings?
  • How can you use your knowledge of technology to enhance opportunities for learning and support the development of higher-order thinking processes?
  • How can you use your knowledge of technology to enhance opportunities for both individual and collective learning?

These are the questions to ask as you explore the variety of ways that computers can be used to support learning and as you make connections between technology use and different learning theories. Educational technology innovation is on the rise; the last two decades have seen an explosion in the amount and kinds of educational software, apps, games, and toys on the market. The problem is that many people believe we are not fully using technology’s affordances to support learning. Also, many technological designers are not informing innovative designs with what is known about how people learn or with learner needs. This has led some people to question just how educational EdTech actually is

A main aim of this course is for you to understand that technology is not a silver bullet. Technology use has important tradeoffs that need to be considered and accounted for when designing learning activities. In this course, you will learn about and use a variety of technological tools that go beyond transferring information to transforming learning processes. The course will discuss important factors in the successes and failures of various approaches and explore the research issues inherent in related learning environments. You will examine the nature of knowledge construction, collaboration, and distributed cognition (along with its consequences) by discussing the relevant literature, viewing demonstrations of sample technologies, and thinking critically about the role of education and technology in society.

Instructor 

Marcela Borge
301C Keller Building

Contact Information

mborge@psu.edu
for Gmail/Google Docs sharing: marcelaborgesoto@gmail.com
office phone: 814-865-0625
office hours: Thursdays, 2:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m. (ET) and by appointment

Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due 

This syllabus builds on examples provided by the NAPLeS Syllabus collection. Specifically, the example provided by Cindy Hmelo-Silver and Rutgers University was used for the organization of this course. The structure and readings were modified to better meet the needs of our online students.

Course Objectives

Upon completion of this course, you should be able to do the following things:

  • Explain how different technology-enhanced learning environments can support specific learning objectives and processes by drawing on learning theory.
  • Present different perspectives on the role of technology as a learning tool in our current society.
  • Be able to discuss issues and theories associated with technology use as part of collaborative discussions with peers.
  • Understand and explain important processes associated with individual and collaborative learning.
  • Explain the tradeoffs of technology use to others through written work and as part of conversation.
  • Use appropriate computer software applications to meaningfully support thinking and learning in your professional context:
    • collective storage and authoring tools (Microsoft 360),
    • sociotechnical systems (Viva Engage),
    • videoconferencing (Google Hangouts, Zoom), and
    • collaborative learning systems (CREATE).
  • Discuss the tradeoffs associated with the use of different technologies to support individual and collective learning.
  • Understand how to work with students to negotiate the use of new and emerging technologies.

Group discussion activities, class participation, and final semester papers should demonstrate all of these objectives.


Required Course Materials

Most World Campus courses require that students purchase materials (e.g., textbooks, specific software, etc.). To learn about how to order materials, please see the Course Materials page. You should check LionPATH approximately 3–4 weeks before the course begins for a list of required materials.
Materials FAQ

Why do I have to use a clunky technology and meet with others online? An important part of this course is learning about complex theories through personal experience with course materials and activities. The CREATE system articulates many learning theories through its design, providing opportunities for you to reflect on concepts in the course through actual experience. Computer-supported collaborative learning has many tradeoffs, which you will get to experience firsthand. Also, since CREATE is a developing technology, you can discuss its design in course papers and see how the instructor works with students to discuss its implementation and to solve any problems that arise. You will also have the opportunity to inform its continuing development. This type of participatory design, which includes feedback and input from all parties, is an important aspect of technology design and implementation. As such, use of the CREATE technology allows the instructor to model important practices.

Additional Materials

Additional readings, exercises, self-assessments, and the like are listed for each lesson in the Course Schedule and are available electronically.


Library Resources

This course requires that you access Penn State library materials specifically reserved for this course. You can access these materials by selecting Library Resources in your course navigation, or by accessing the Library E-Reserves Search and search for your instructor's last name.

Many of the University Libraries resources can be utilized from a distance. Through the Libraries website, you can

  • access magazine, journal, and newspaper articles online using library databases;
  • borrow materials and have them delivered to your doorstep—or even your desktop;
  • get research help via email, chat, or phone using the Ask a Librarian service; and
  • much more. 

You must have an active Penn State Access Account to take full advantage of the Libraries' resources and service.  The Off-Campus Users page has additional information about these free services.


Technical Requirements

Technical Requirements
Operating System

Canvas, Penn State's Learning Management System (LMS), supports most recent versions of Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac operating systems. 

To determine if your operating system is supported, please review Canvas' computer specifications.

Browser

Canvas supports the last two versions of every major browser release. It is highly recommended that you update to the newest version of whatever browser you are using.

Please note that Canvas does not support the use of Internet Explorer. Students and instructors should choose a different browser to use.   

To determine if your browser is supported, please review the list of Canvas Supported Browsers.


Note: Cookies must be enabled, and pop-up blockers should be configured to permit new windows from Penn State websites.
Additional Canvas Requirements For a list of software, hardware, and computer settings specifically required by the Canvas LMS, please review Canvas' computer specifications.
Additional Software

All Penn State students have access to Microsoft Office 365, including Microsoft Office applications such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

Students will need a PDF reader, such as Adobe Reader.

Hardware

Monitor: Monitor capable of at least 1024 x 768 resolution
Audio: Microphone, Speakers
Camera (optional, recommended): Standard webcam - many courses may require a webcam for assignments or exam proctoring software.

Mobile Device (optional) The Canvas mobile app is available for versions of iOS and Android. To determine if your device is capable of using the Canvas Mobile App, please review the Canvas Mobile App Requirements.


Student Education Experience Questionnaire (SEEQ)

During the semester you will receive information for completing the Student Education Experience Questionnaire (SEEQ). Your participation is an opportunity to provide anonymous feedback on your learning experience. Your feedback is important because it allows us to understand your experience in this course and make changes to improve the learning experiences of future students. Please monitor email and course communications for links and availability dates.


If you need technical assistance at any point during the course, please contact the Service Desk.

For registration, advising, disability services, help with materials, exams, general problem solving, visit World Campus Student Services!


 Course Schedule

Note: All due dates reflect North American eastern time (ET).

Some of the readings listed are available as e-Reserves from the library. To access e-Reserves, click the Library Resources link on the Canvas Navigation menu.

Orientation
Lesson 0

Orientation and Course Overview

Readings

  • Orientation materials
  • Getting to know the class
  • Viva Engage Community Guide
Activities and assignments
  • Course email
  • Availability for team meetings
  • Viva Engage introductions

Part 1: Unpacking the Problem of Technology Use for Learning

Lesson 1
Lesson 1

The Changing Educational Landscape

Readings and videos

Everyone must read/view the following:

Then, pick one of the following:

  • Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3, 349–375.
  • Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 211.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
  • Montealegre, R., & Cascio, W. F. (2017). Technology-driven changes in work and employmentCommunications of the ACM60(12), 60–67.
  • Veletsianos, G. (2016). The defining characteristics of emerging technologies and emerging practices in digital education. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Athabasca University Press. (E-Reserve)
  • TEDx Talks. (2018, March 28). Skills every child will need to succeed in the 21st Century | Dr. Laura A. Jana | TEDxChandigarh [Video]. YouTube.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage posts
Lesson 2
Lesson 2Understanding the Evolving Digital Divide

Readings and videos

Everyone must read the following:
  • Gangadharan, S. P. (2017). The downside of digital inclusion: Expectations and experiences of privacy and surveillance among marginal Internet users. New Media & Society, 19(4), 597–615.
  • Hsu, M. H., Tien, S. W., Lin, H. C., & Chang, C. M. (2015). Understanding the roles of cultural differences and socio-economic status in social media continuance intention. Information Technology & People28(1), 224–241.

Supplemental Readings

Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage posts 
Lesson 3
Lesson 3Technology as a Societal Good?

Readings

Everyone must read the following:

Then, pick one of the following:

  • TEDx Talks. (2023, May 1). How AI could save (not destroy) education | Sal Kahn | TED [Video]. YouTube.
    • Kahn argues that emergent AI technology could serve as a personal tutor and collaborator for learners, thereby mitigating digital divides and scaling high quality instruction.
  • TEDx Talks. (2018, November 12). The future of learning | Sugata Mitra | TEDxNewcastle [Video]. YouTube.
    • Mitra draws on twenty years of experiments on children's education to argue that children can learn anything on their own with the help of computers.
  • Slush. (2016, December 2). The future of health and medicine: Where can technology take us? [Video]. YouTube.
    • Daniel Kraft discusses how technology can lead to more proactive medicine, changing current healthcare paradigms.
  • TED. (2013, April 23). Erik Brynjolfsson: The key to growth? Race with the machines [Video]. YouTube.
    • Brynjolfsson argues that technology will not take our jobs or ruin society; we are just experiencing “the growing pains of a radically reorganized economy.” He anticipates big innovations if we start to see computers as our teammates.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
  • Google Doc assignment
Lesson 4
Lesson 4Technology as a Societal Evil?

Readings and videos

Everyone must read the following:

  • Collins & Halverson, Chapter 3: "The Technology Skeptic’s Argument"
  • Collins & Halverson, Chapter 7: "What May Be Lost and What May Be Gained"

Then, pick one of the following:

  • Democracy Now. (2023, May 18). AI Expert: We urgently need ethical guidelines & safeguards to limit risk of Artificial intelligence [Video]. YouTube.
    • In this episode of Democracy Now, experts weigh in on critical concerns with AI and how we can work to mitigate potential issues.
  • TED. (2019, January 14). How to be “Team Human” in the digital future | Douglas Rushkoff [Video]. YouTube.
    • Society-centered: Rushkoff discusses technology innovation and design and how we can ensure that we design a pro-human future that promotes creativity and collaboration.
  • Turkle, S. (2012, February). Connected, but alone? [Video]. TED Conferences.
    • From the video description: "Sherry Turkle studies how our devices and online personas are redefining human connection and communication—and asks us to think deeply about the new kinds of connection we want to have."
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017, September). We’re building a dystopia just to get people to click on ads [Video]. TED Conferences.
    • Zeynep Tufekci is a techno-sociologist who "details how the same algorithms companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon use to get you to click on ads are also used to organize your access to political and social information. And the machines aren't even the real threat. What we need to understand is how the powerful might use AI to control us—and what we can do in response."
  • TEDx Talks. (2017, March 22). AI & the future of work | Volker Hirsch | TEDxManchester [Video]. YouTube.
    • Society-centered: This talk explores how AI will eliminate jobs and what that means for education (changing our focus on the skills we develop).
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
Lesson 5
Lesson 5Thinking About Technology Integration: Potential and Problems

Readings

Everyone must read the following:

  • Collins & Halverson, Chapter 8: "How Schools Can Support the New Technologies" (speaks to the potential)

Then, pick one of the following:

  • Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85. (speaks to problems in K–12)
  • Ifenthaler, D., & Tracey, M. W. (2016). Exploring the relationship of ethics and privacy in learning analytics and design: Implications for the field of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development64(5), 877–880.
  • Guze, P. A. (2015). Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 126, 260.
  • Haines, R., Lane, F., Rosenberg, J. L., & Walta, J. (2015). Electronic privacy in higher education (CLE). Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, (10), 31.
  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others: Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher educationComputers & Education, 95, 216–230.
Activities and assignments
  • Part 1 reading questions due
Lesson 6
Lesson 6Part 1 Team Discussion

Readings

  • none
Activities and assignments
  • Teams must schedule a synchronous meeting in Zoom to discuss concepts from Part 1 of the course in depth.
  • Team discussion

Part 2: Using Technology to Enhance Thinking Processes

Lesson 7
Lesson 7Considerations for the Design of Learning Environments

Readings

Everyone must read the following:

  • Collins & Halverson, Chapter 5: "The Seeds of a New Education System"
  • Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2016). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131–161). Academic Press.

Then, pick one of the following:

Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
Lesson 8
Lesson 8Enhancing Metacognitive Processes

Readings

Pick one from the following articles introducing metacognition, depending on your level of interest:

Then, from the following, pick one more piece that examines technological support for metacognition:

  • in medicine: Könings, K. D., van Berlo, J., Koopmans, R., Hoogland, R., Spanjers, I. A. E., ten Haaf, J. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2016). Using a smartphone app and coaching group sessions to promote residents’ reflection in the workplace. Academic Medicine, 91(3), 365370.
  • in the workplace: Gibbs, S., Moore, K., Steel, G., & McKinnon, A. (2017). The Dunning-Kruger effect in a workplace computing setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 589–595.
  • in a middle school design context: Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2018). The impact of critical feedback choice on students' revision, performance, learning, and memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 351–367.
  • in higher education from a communities-of-learners perspective: Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage posts
 
Lesson 9
Lesson 9

Enhancing Social Processes

Readings

Everyone must read the following:
  • Stahl, G. (2010). Group cognition as a foundation for the new science of learning. In New science of learning (pp. 23–44). Springer.
Then, pick one of the following:
  • Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning13(1), 61–92.
  • Borge, M., & Shimoda, T. (2019). Designing a computer-supported collective regulation system: A theoretically informed approach. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, & Learning, 11(2), 1–30. (E-Reserve)
  • Garcia, E., Moizer, J., Wilkins, S., & Haddoud, M. (2019). Student learning in higher education through blogging in the classroom. Computers & Education, 136, 61–74.
  • Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher38(10), 1064–1069. (Note: If you are using Firefox and have difficulty accessing this article, please try another browser.)
  • Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K–12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 623–645.
  • Guraya, S. Y. (2016). The usage of social networking sites by medical students for educational purposes: A meta-analysis and systematic review. North American Journal of Medical Sciences8(7), 268.
  • Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer.
  • Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2017). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199.
  • Wegerif, R. (2016). Applying dialogic theory to illuminate the relationship between literacy education and teaching thinking in the context of the Internet AgeL1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 16, 1–21.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
Lesson 10
Lesson 10Enhancing Creativity and Personal Expression

Readings and videos

Everyone must read the following:

Supplemental Readings and Potential Examples for Final Projects:

Potentially useful for background and guidance on final project video option: 

  • Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Searle, K. A. (2019). Understanding media literacy and DIY creativity in youth digital productions. In The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–10). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    • This paper provides different examples of digital storytelling and explains the types of learning that resulted. As such, it provides good background.
  • Kocaman-Karoglu, A. (2016). Personal voices in higher education: A digital storytelling experience for pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies21(5), 1153–1168.
    • This paper has specific examples of tasks and goals necessary for creating digital stories and would be a very helpful resource for anyone planning to create one for a final project.
  • The RSA. (2010, October 14). RSA ANIMATE: Changing education paradigms [Video]. YouTube.
    • This video provides an interesting alternative to a visual story and may push you to think outside of the box. It also contains some very controversial claims, which could also provide good conversation for our online discussion.

Additional readings on creativity and personal expression:

  • Boltz, L. O., Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: Empathy through gaming - perspective-taking in a complex worldTechTrends59(6), 3–8.
  • Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2017). Between structure and improvisation: A conversation on creativity as a social and collaborative behavior with Dr. Keith Sawyer. TechTrends61(1), 13–18.
  • Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada‐Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children's use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology49(5), 870–882.
  • Smith, B. E., Kiili, C., & Kauppinen, M. (2016). Transmediating argumentation: Students composing across written essays and digital videos in higher education. Computers & Education102, 138–151.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
Lesson 11
Lesson 11Enhancing Cognitive Processes

Readings and videos

Everyone must read the following:

Then, pick one of the following:

  • van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior72, 577–588.
  • Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in “post-fact” society. American Behavioral Scientist61(4), 441–454. (Note: If you are using Firefox and have difficulty accessing this article, please try another browser.)
  • McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J., & Wineburg, S. (2017). The challenge that's bigger than fake news: Civic reasoning in a social media environmentAmerican Educator41(3), 4.
  • Musgrove, A. T., Powers, J. R., Rebar, L. C., & Musgrove, G. J. (2018). Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College & Undergraduate Libraries25(3), 243–260. (Note: If you are using Firefox and have difficulty accessing this article, please try another browser.)
  • Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education89, 16–31.
  • Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior63, 50–58.
  • Sultan, N. (2015). Reflective thoughts on the potential and challenges of wearable technology for healthcare provision and medical education. International Journal of Information Management35(5), 521–526.
  • Kok, E. M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). Before your very eyes: The value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education. Medical Education51(1), 114–122.
Activities and assignments
  • Viva Engage post
Lesson 12
Lesson 12Transforming Learning With Technology: Where Do We Go Now?

Readings

Everyone must read the following:

  • Collins & Halverson, Chapter 10: "Rethinking Education in a Technological World"

Then, pick one of the following:

Activities and assignments
  • Final Viva Engage post
  • Part 2 reading questions due
 
Lesson 13
Lesson 13

Part 2 Team Discussion

Readings

  • none
Activities and assignments
  • Teams must schedule a synchronous meeting in Zoom to discuss concepts from Part 2 in depth.
  • Team discussion
 

Final Project Submissions

Final Project Submissions
Lesson 14Final Project Submissions

Readings

  • none
Activities and assignments
  • Submit a final copy of your project in the course and to the Viva Engage environment.
  • Final project
Note: If you are planning to graduate this semester, please communicate your intent to graduate to your instructor. This will alert your instructor to the need to submit your final grade in time to meet the published graduation deadlines. For more information about graduation policies and deadlines, please go to the Graduation Information on the My Penn State Online Student Portal.

Formal instruction will end on the last day of class. Provided that you have an active Penn State Access Account user ID and password, you will continue to be able to access the course materials for one year, starting from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered (with the exception of library reserves and other external resources that may have a shorter archival period). After one year, you might be able to access the course based on the policies of the program or department offering the course material, up to a maximum of three years from the end date of the academic semester in which the course was offered. For more information, please review the University Course Archival Policy.


Course Organization

The course is divided into two parts, each requiring a team discussion at completion. You will be sorted into teams in Lesson 3. These teams will remain constant for the entire course. You will receive grades for Part 1 activities after completing the Part 1 discussion; grades for Part 2 activities will be released after you complete the Part 2 discussion. Final grades will be put up after submission of the final paper.


Course Activities and Weighting of Grades

Orientation (5% of course grade)

Fill out the Availability for Team Meetings Form.

Participation (25% of course grade)

Course participation takes place via required course activities and in Viva Engage discussions; it is mandatory. Viva Engage participation is meant to simulate a discussion-based seminar; therefore, it is important to be present in this social environment. How or what you post—whether a new discussion thread or a reply to another’s post—is up to you, as long as you follow the rules as described in the Viva Engage guide. Any more than two missed posts will lead to a grade reduction. You are expected to post twice per lesson, but most students post more. The Viva Engage Community Guide document is included in the orientation lesson to help you understand what you need to do to succeed as a member of our online community. The guide will explain the goals of the Viva Engage community and the expectations for all participants. You can post whenever you like each week, but make sure you do each of the following things: Most importantly, recognize that you will be making a very important contribution to the class, with an opportunity to influence how classmates think about and interpret course content. Thank you in advance for being a valuable member of our learning community.

  • Adhere to the goals and rules stated in the Viva Engage Community Guide document.
  • Introduce yourself to the community during the orientation lesson.
  • Make at least two different posts spread out throughout the lesson week, although more would be great.
  • Respond to students who reply to your posts. Remember that you are the “host” for a discussion thread that you've posted.
Team Discussions of Course Content (40% of course grade)

Teams will be assigned an online collaborative chat space where they are expected to meet synchronously for Lessons 6 and 13 (after Parts 1 and 2 of the course). During these lessons, the team members will complete an individual assignment to help them synthesize the readings for each part of the course and to prepare for team discussion. The team will then set a time to meet for two to three hours. During that time, they will discuss the readings, assess the quality of their discussion, discuss their strengths and weaknesses as a group, and select strategies to improve their next discussion. You are not expected to know the “right” answers; in fact, you will do better on the assignment if you admit to not understanding something and work together to make sense of course readings. Grades are based on the quality of the sense-making processes shown during discussion in CREATE. Showing evidence of having read the readings by pulling from them and working collaboratively to make sense of them is what matters. You can get an A based on the quality of the discussion or on improvement in quality from the first to the last discussion. Rarely do teams achieve less than a B for the discussions; on those occasions, it is because the team did not prepare by completing the readings or reflective activities, or they did not work together to improve their collaborative discussions. This is a very difficult assignment, but it also happens to be one of the most positive for students each semester!

Final Project (30% of course grade)

For your final project, you have the option of writing a position paper or creating a video/digital story. Your final project should provide evidence of what you have learned from this course. Below are the specifications for both options.

Option 1: Position Paper (Collaborative or Individual) 

The position paper should synthesize at least 10 course readings with other papers in the field to support a position on the use of technology for learning. In your position paper, you must convince the instructor that there is a problem worth examining and that you understand the problem space (people and issues involved, existing and desired states associated with the problem) by drawing upon the course literature and other papers you may have read in other classes. You must also provide a coherent and convincing argument for your position or proposed solution that builds on the literature presented and on the potential for future research in the area. Following the course structure, make a concrete argument about the promise and problems associated with technology, specifying that these problems can be addressed with careful and strategic use. You could even suggest some concrete examples of how you could use technology to support students' thinking and development.

Position papers are very hard for most students to write because they require a very sophisticated writing ability and understanding of the course readings, but the course is structured in such a way as to help you write your paper (hint, hint). Please note that perfection is not expected; in fact, you are encouraged to take a risk and try something outside your comfort zone. For the position paper, the instructor may provide extra credit to those who do a good job detailing how the readings have modified their perspectives on learning with technology.

Papers must not exceed 15 double-spaced, APA-formatted pages. This includes references but excludes any appendices.

Position Paper Rubric
CategoryParametersPoints
General
  • No more than 15 pages (5 points)
  • Follows APA guidelines (10 points)
  • Uses course readings to support ideas and does not simply summarize the readings (10 points)
25
Introduction
  • Makes a claim about the state of technology to support students' thinking, problems with how teachers use technology, or some other central argument drawn from course readings that will frame the purpose of the paper (25 points)
  • Describes the purpose of the paper and what the reader should expect organizationally, serving as an outline for the paper: In this paper, we will argue that ______. In doing so, we will focus on literature about ______, and in this way we hope to ______. (20 points)
45
Literature review
  • Extends claim made in introduction by using course readings to support the ideas of the author (20 points)
  • Includes at least 16 references: at least 10 course readings in the literature review, at least four of which are described in detail to support argument, along with at least six additional readings not included in the course, but related to argument delete (60 points)
  • Literature review connects to the introduction and makes a coherent, well-justified argument, or provides insights to inform the reader about a topic area central to the course readings (20 points)
100
Discussion/conclusion
  • The author synthesizes the readings to support their major claim in a way that connects back to the introduction and readings (20 points)
  • Points out gaps in what we know based on readings presented and makes suggestions for future research questions that are important to address (10 points)
30
Total
  • Total points possible
200
 
Option 2: Video Project

(2A: Collaborative Option) Informational Video

The video should convince an audience of your peers that there is a problem with how we use technology in educational contexts. You should draw on the course readings not only to make your case but also to provide a potential solution—a way to mitigate problems and increase the likelihood of deeper learning outcomes.
Informational Video Rubric
CategoryParametersPoints
General
  • Eight to ten minutes long (10 points)
  • Includes a detailed script and follows the script (25 points)
  • Includes a detailed storyboard and follows storyboard (25 points)
60
Content
  • Makes a convincing argument that there is a problem with how we use technology in educational contexts (20 points)
  • Draws on course readings to support both the problems associated with technology use and the potential solutions (50 points)
  • Cites at least eight course readings and integrates them into the video well (40 points)
110
Visuals/audio
  • Editing creates clean scenes with clear transitions (10 points)
  • Audio is clear and of high quality (10 points)
  • Visuals (pictures and video) are engaging and of high quality (10 points)
30
Total
  • Total points possible
200

(2B: Individual Option) Digital Story

Create a five- to eight-minute digital story (in a video) in which you do the following things:

Digital Story Video Rubric
CategoryParametersPoints
General
  • Five to eight minutes long (10 points)
  • Includes a detailed script and follows the script (25 points)
  • Includes a detailed storyboard and follows storyboard (25 points)
60
Content
  • Discusses relationship with technology, most powerful ideas learned from course readings, and what a new relationship with technology could look like (as a learner or instructor) (50 points)
  • Includes a dramatic question or compelling hook (10 points)
  • There is a personal voice or perspective (10 points)
  • Includes emotional content, truthful approaches that hold the audiences’ attention; draws upon the audience's emotions, empathy, or understanding though music and narrative to craft a story that affects emotional responses (40 points)
110
Visuals/audio
  • Uses an engaging rhythm (pacing), not moving too quickly or too slowly (10 points)
  • Audio is clear and of high quality (10 points)
  • Images replace words; involves sound and music (a soundtrack) (10 points)
30
Total
  • Total point possible
200

  • Discuss your relationship with technology or the role that technology has previously played in learning in your life.
  • Discuss what you think were the most powerful ideas presented in the course readings.
  • Draw upon course readings to reimagine how, as a learner or instructor, your relationship with technology could look (wherein you utilize it best to enhance learning experiences).
Grading Scale

The following grading scale will be used to determine your overall course grade.

Grading Scale
PercentageLetter grade
93-100
A
90-92.9
A-
86-89.9
B+
83-85.9
B
80-82.9
B-
77-79.9
C+
70-76.9
C
60-69.9
D
0-59.9
F

This course cannot be used to meet the requirements for the LDT option for the M.Ed. in Learning, Design, and Technology if the course grade is a C or below. It also cannot be used to meet the requirements for the Postbaccalaureate Certificate in Educational Technology Integration if the course grade is below a C.

Please refer to the University Grading Policy for Graduate Courses for additional information about University grading policies.

If, for reasons beyond the student's control, a student is prevented from completing a course within the prescribed time, the grade in that course may be deferred with the concurrence of the instructor. The symbol DF appears on the student's transcript until the course has been completed. Non-emergency permission for filing a deferred grade must be requested by the student before the beginning of the final examination period. In an emergency situation, an instructor can approve a deferred grade after the final exam period has started. Under emergency conditions during which the instructor is unavailable, authorization is required from one of the following: the dean of the college in which the candidate is enrolled; the executive director of the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division or is a provisional student; or the campus chancellor of the student's associated Penn State campus.

For additional information please refer to the Deferring a Grade page.
Assignments Due

Assignments are accepted up until 11:59 p.m. (ET) on the last day of the lesson week, after which they will be considered late. Please communicate with your instructor if you find yourself in a difficult situation and need an exception.

Grading Policy

The instructor tries to be flexible with online students when it comes to turning in individual work, because they know that many students work 50 to 60 hours per week. However, with this flexibility comes the cost of having grades up quickly, because the instructor will have to go back to previous folders and grade old work, which can take a lot of time. As a compromise, the instructor will only accept late work if it is still submitted during the current part of the course (Part 1 or Part 2). Late posts are okay as long as they are all completed prior to the team discussion. If you submit a late post, you must take on some of the responsibility for your grading by emailing a screenshot of the post to the instructor and then making sure the grade is revised in the grade book. This will help reduce the demands on the instructor and help make this policy work more efficiently. It is important to remember that group discussions cannot be late according to this policy, nor can the final paper. If an emergency arises during a discussion week, please notify your team and the instructor as soon as possible.

Opting for an Individual Experience

Some students may be unable to work in a team due to life demands. To accommodate these students, there is an individualized option, but you are discouraged from taking it. Here is why: In lieu of each team discussion, students taking the individual option must submit a five- to six-page APA-formatted essay synthesizing the course readings for the relevant part of the course. These essays are graded carefully to see the extent to which the student has fully understood the readings. This is far less fun and engaging than a group discussion, where the grade is dependent not on total understanding of the course content but on your attempts to make sense of it together. The student must also turn in all aspects of the final paper and moderate Viva Engage by themselves. Lastly, the student will not get the benefit of bonding with teammates or discussing the readings with others. That last reason is the biggest downside, as it has become a favorite of prior students.

An Invitation to Speakers of English as a Second Language

If you are uncomfortable with public speaking or writing in English, you are strongly encouraged to make an appointment with the instructor privately during the first two weeks of class to establish ways to ensure your comfort in completing the required assignments and speaking in class.


Academic Integrity

Each individual and group assignment will be checked with Turnitin, an online database for plagiarism detection. Talking over your ideas and getting comments on your writing from friends are not examples of plagiarism. Taking someone else's words (published or not) and calling them your own is plagiarism. Plagiarism has dire consequences, including failing the paper in question, failing the course, and University disciplinary action, depending on the circumstances of the offense. The simplest way to avoid plagiarism is to document the sources of your information carefully. You are strongly encouraged to discuss individual assignments with others (a well-known technique for effective learning), but you must indicate clearly in your assignment the people with whom you discussed the assignment and complete an individual write-up, written by you (and you alone) in your own words. With respect to the team project, teamwork should represent the effort of all team members. If your team has interpersonal conflicts or members who are not contributing adequately to project milestones, please make an appointment with the instructor or TA to discuss the situation. Finally, familiarize yourself with the Penn State Principles and University Code of Conduct.

According to Penn State policy G-9: Academic Integrity , an academic integrity violation is “an intentional, unintentional, or attempted violation of course or assessment policies to gain an academic advantage or to advantage or disadvantage another student academically.” Unless your instructor tells you otherwise, you must complete all course work entirely on your own, using only sources that have been permitted by your instructor, and you may not assist other students with papers, quizzes, exams, or other assessments. If your instructor allows you to use ideas, images, or word phrases created by another person (e.g., from Course Hero or Chegg) or by generative technology, such as ChatGPT, you must identify their source. You may not submit false or fabricated information, use the same academic work for credit in multiple courses, or share instructional content. Students with questions about academic integrity should ask their instructor before submitting work.

Students facing allegations of academic misconduct may not drop/withdraw from the affected course unless they are cleared of wrongdoing (see G-9: Academic Integrity ). Attempted drops will be prevented or reversed, and students will be expected to complete course work and meet course deadlines. Students who are found responsible for academic integrity violations face academic outcomes, which can be severe, and put themselves at jeopardy for other outcomes which may include ineligibility for Dean’s List, pass/fail elections, and grade forgiveness. Students may also face consequences from their home/major program and/or The Schreyer Honors College.

How Academic Integrity Violations Are Handled
World Campus students are expected to act with civility and personal integrity; respect other students' dignity, rights, and property; and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their own efforts. An environment of academic integrity is requisite to respect for oneself and others, as well as a civil community.

In cases where academic integrity is questioned, the Policy on Academic Integrity indicates that procedure requires an instructor to inform the student of the allegation. Procedures allow a student to accept or contest a charge. If a student chooses to contest a charge, the case will then be managed by the respective college or campus Academic Integrity Committee. If that committee recommends an administrative sanction (Formal Warning, Conduct Probation, Suspension, Expulsion), the claim will be referred to the Office of Student Accountability and Conflict Response.

All Penn State colleges abide by this Penn State policy, but review procedures may vary by college when academic dishonesty is suspected. Information about Penn State's academic integrity policy and college review procedures is included in the information that students receive upon enrolling in a course. To obtain that information in advance of enrolling in a course, please contact us by going to the Contacts & Help page .


Accommodating Disabilities

 

Penn State welcomes students with disabilities into the University's educational programs. Every Penn State campus has resources for students with disabilities. The Student Disability Resources (SDR) website provides contacts for disability services at every Penn State campus. For further information, please visit the SDR website.

In order to apply for reasonable accommodations, you must contact the appropriate disability resources office at the campus where you are officially enrolled, participate in an intake interview, and provide documentation based on the documentation guidelines. If the documentation supports your request for reasonable accommodations, your campus's disability resources office will provide you with an accommodation letter. Please share this letter with your instructors and discuss the accommodations with them as early in your courses as possible. You must follow this process for every semester that you request accommodations.


Additional Policies

If you have a crisis or safety concern, mental health services are available to you as a Penn State student. Crisis and emergency contacts are available, no matter where you are located:

For information about additional policies regarding Penn State Access Accounts; credit by examination; course tuition, fees, and refund schedules; and drops and withdrawals, please see the World Campus Student Center website.

Veterans and currently serving military personnel and/or dependents with unique circumstances (e.g., upcoming deployments, drill/duty requirements, VA appointments, etc.) are welcome and encouraged to communicate these, in advance if possible, to the instructor in the case that special arrangements need to be made.

In order to protect your privacy, course access is limited to those individuals who have direct responsibility for the quality of your educational experience. In addition to the instructor, a teaching assistant or college administrator may be provided access in order to ensure optimal faculty availability and access. World Campus technical staff may also be given access in order to resolve technical support issues.
  1. Students are responsible for online course content, taking notes, obtaining other materials provided by the instructor, taking tests (if applicable), and completing assignments as scheduled by the instructor.  As a general rule, students should plan on logging into the course at least three times per week and spending at least three hours per course credit per week on the course, e.g., if the course is three credits, the student should plan on spending at least 9-12 hours per week on the course, just as they would in a residence course.
  2. Students are responsible for keeping track of changes in the course syllabus made by the instructor throughout the semester.
  3. Students are responsible for monitoring their grades.
  4. Students must contact their instructor (and teammates when working on any collaborative learning assignments) as soon as possible if they anticipate missing long periods of online time due to events such as chronic illnesses, death in the family, business travel, or other appropriate events. The instructor will determine the minimal log on time and participation required in order to meet course responsibilities. In the event of other unforeseen conflicts, the instructor and student will arrive at a solution together.
    1. Requests for taking exams or submitting assignments after the due dates require documentation of events such as illness, family emergency, or a business-sanctioned activity.
    2. Conflicts with dates on which examinations or assignments are scheduled must be discussed with the instructor or TA prior to the date of the examination or assignment.
  5. Students are responsible for following appropriate netiquette (network etiquette) when communicating with their instructor and classmates. For reference, see the Academic Success Kit.
  6. Behaviors that disrupt other students’ learning are not acceptable and will be addressed by the instructor.
  7. For severe and chronic problems with student disruptive behavior, the following will be applied for resolution:
    1. Senate Committee on Student Life policy on managing classroom disruptions: Office of Student Accountability and Conflict Response.
    2. Penn State Principles

Penn State takes great pride to foster a diverse and inclusive environment for students, faculty, and staff. Acts of intolerance, discrimination, or harassment due to age, ancestry, color, disability, gender, gender identity, national origin, race, religious belief, sexual orientation, or veteran status are not tolerated and can be reported through Educational Equity via the Report Bias webpage.


Disclaimer: Please note that the specifics of this Course Syllabus are subject to change; you will be responsible for abiding by any such changes. Your instructor will notify you of any changes.


 


Top of page